Update keynote readme with updated benchmark figures (#4975)

# Description of Changes

Update keynote readme with updated benchmark figures

# API and ABI breaking changes

N/A

# Expected complexity level and risk

0

# Testing

N/A

Author: joshua-spacetime

templates/keynote-2/README.md

@@ -24,16 +24,17 @@ All tests use 50 concurrent connections with a transfer workload (read-modify-wr
 
 | System                            | TPS (~0% Contention) | TPS (~80% Contention) |
 | --------------------------------- | -------------------- | --------------------- |
-| **SpacetimeDB**                   | **107,850**          | **103,590**           |
-| SQLite + Node HTTP + Drizzle      | 7,845                | 7,652                 |
+| SpacetimeDB (TypeScript Module)   |                      | 307,074               |
+| SpacetimeDB (Rust Module)         |                      | 265,542               |
+| SQLite + Node HTTP + Drizzle      |                      | 3,236                 |
 | Bun + Drizzle + Postgres          | 7,115                | 2,074                 |
 | Postgres + Node HTTP + Drizzle    | 6,429                | 2,798                 |
 | Supabase + Node HTTP + Drizzle    | 6,310                | 1,268                 |
 | CockroachDB + Node HTTP + Drizzle | 5,129                | 197                   |
 | PlanetScale + Node HTTP + Drizzle | 477                  | 30                    |
 | Convex                            | 438                  | 58                    |
 
-**Key Finding:** SpacetimeDB achieves **~14x higher throughput** than the next best option (SQLite RPC) and maintains nearly identical performance under high contention (only ~4% drop), while traditional databases suffer significant degradation (CockroachDB drops 96%).
+**Key Finding:** SpacetimeDB reaches hundreds of thousands of TPS for the transfer workload, while the best non-SpacetimeDB result shown here is SQLite RPC at 3,236 TPS. Traditional databases also suffer significant degradation under high contention (CockroachDB drops 96%).
 
 ### Contention Impact
 
@@ -51,6 +52,8 @@ For cloud services, we tested paid tiers to give them their best chance:
 - **Supabase**: Pro tier
 - **Convex**: Pro tier
 
+The reported SpacetimeDB module results were run against a 5-way replicated cluster rather than a single standalone node.
+
 ### Test Architecture
 
 All benchmarks follow an **apples-to-apples** comparison using the same architecture pattern: