Nit: fix spec description

[aramprice]

Fixes #544

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 7ab45f3e-dddb-4924-a952-64411c194ab8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6f0784f and d455caa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• bosh-stemcell/spec/stemcells/cloudstack_spec.rb

---

Walkthrough

The RSpec context description in the CloudStack stemcell specification file was updated to reflect the actual implementation stage name. The context block that previously referenced "installed by bosh_disable_password_authentication" now references "installed by base_ssh", aligning the test specification with the corresponding implementation in the base_ssh stage. The underlying test assertion remains unchanged, continuing to verify that password authentication is disabled in the SSH configuration file.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'Nit: fix spec description' is vague and does not clearly convey what specific change is being made or which file is affected.	Consider a more specific title like 'Fix RSpec context description in cloudstack_spec.rb' to clearly indicate the change location and nature.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description check	✅ Passed	The description 'Fixes #544' is related to the changeset as it references the issue that drives this spec description update.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The code change in cloudstack_spec.rb correctly renames the RSpec context from 'installed by bosh_disable_password_authentication' to 'installed by base_ssh', fully satisfying the requirement in issue #544.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	The change is limited to renaming a single RSpec context description in cloudstack_spec.rb, which is entirely in scope and matches the objective of issue #544.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix-spec-description-544

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}