-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 52
Add support for cgroup-only device nodes #314
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
elezar
wants to merge
3
commits into
cncf-tags:main
Choose a base branch
from
elezar:add-support-for-wildcard-devices
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ const ( | |
| v080 version = "v0.8.0" | ||
| v100 version = "v1.0.0" | ||
| v110 version = "v1.1.0" | ||
| v120 version = "v1.2.0" | ||
|
|
||
| // vEarliest is the earliest supported version of the CDI specification | ||
| vEarliest version = v030 | ||
|
|
@@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ var validSpecVersions = requiredVersionMap{ | |
| v080: requiresV080, | ||
| v100: requiresV100, | ||
| v110: requiresV110, | ||
| v120: requiresV120, | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Note to self. I still need to add tests for this. |
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // ValidateVersion checks whether the specified spec version is valid. | ||
|
|
@@ -142,6 +144,39 @@ func (r requiredVersionMap) requiredVersion(spec *Spec) version { | |
| return minVersion | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // requiresV120 returns true if the spec uses v1.2.0 features. | ||
| func requiresV120(spec *Spec) bool { | ||
| if spec.ContainerEdits.requiresV120() { | ||
| return true | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for _, d := range spec.Devices { | ||
| if d.ContainerEdits.requiresV120() { | ||
| return true | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return false | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // requiresV120 returns true if the specified containers uses v1.2.0 features. | ||
| // These are: | ||
| // - Wildcard devices that can be used to only inject cgroup rules for a | ||
| // container. | ||
| func (e ContainerEdits) requiresV120() bool { | ||
| for _, dn := range e.DeviceNodes { | ||
| switch { | ||
| case dn.Path == "*": | ||
| return true | ||
| case dn.Major == -1: | ||
| return true | ||
| case dn.Minor == -1: | ||
| return true | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| return false | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // requiresV110 returns true if the spec uses v1.1.0 features. | ||
| func requiresV110(spec *Spec) bool { | ||
| if i := spec.ContainerEdits.IntelRdt; i != nil { | ||
|
|
||
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It feels as if this is the CORE change here since this SHOULD allow us to inject the cgroup rule even without performing additional checks as long as SOME non-zero device major is specified. This works because we explicitly ignore errors getting device node information if at least the Major and Type is is specified. What we need is the
-1tonilmapping sincenilis interpreted as*by the OCI runtime spec.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just a mental note... It's a pity we don't have
MajorandMinoras*int64instead, so we could differentiate between zero- and omitted values.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I actually wonder, do we need "safety net' to prevent accidental "allow all devices" setting?