Update verification matrix in README.md

Author: codebyfernanda

README.md

@@ -59,20 +59,20 @@ Below is the comprehensive verification matrix tracking all requirements, archit
 
 | Status | Phase / Focus | Deliverable | Technical Description |
 | :---: | :--- | :--- | :--- |
-| 🟢 **Done** | **1. Test Planning** | `test-plan_week_004.md` | Comprehensive architectural documentation mapping test suite objectives, tools (Python, Pytest, Requests), execution scope, and explicit completion criteria. |
-| 🟢 **Done** | | Scenarios Mapping | Exhaustive list of target endpoints, positive paths, negative validations, and contract boundary conditions structured prior to core refactoring. |
-| 🟢 **Done** | **2. Test Expansion** | Users Endpoint | Maintained and evolved the legacy functional validations from Week 3 incrementally, avoiding regression. |
-| 🟢 **Done** | | Login Validation | Complete coverage of authentication mechanisms including happy paths, wrong passwords, non-existent entities, and empty fields. |
-| 🟢 **Done** | | Products Management | Full integration flow covering listing, schema validations, query-by-ID, updates, and cascading teardowns (deletions). |
-| 🟢 **Done** | | Dynamic Auth Flow | Clean handling of Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), automatically generating and distributing administrator tokens to protected endpoints. |
-| 🟢 **Done** | **3. Metrics & Reports** | English Execution | Main repository documentation completely written in English, maintaining industry standards for open-source and professional setups. |
-| 🟢 **Done** | | Coverage Framework | Clear mathematical analysis outlining total endpoints tested vs. available API pathways, using the reference article matrix. |
-| 🟢 **Done** | | Boundary Definitions | Fully documented constraints, explicitly stating which edge-case responses or third-party scopes were excluded with technical justifications. |
-| 🟢 **Done** | **4. Defect Tracking** | Real Bugs Discovery | Active scanning of the target infrastructure to reveal unexpected payload exceptions or implicit server crashes. |
-| 🟢 **Done** | | GitHub Issues | Standardized bug report logs opened on the repository containing clear severity indexing, reproduction steps, expected behaviors, and raw console payloads. |
-| 🟢 **Done** | **5. Infrastructure** | Contract Verification | Integration of `pytest-schema` validating server payloads against strict architectural data types for at least 3 separate endpoints. |
-| 🟢 **Done** | | GitHub Actions (CI) | Workflow definitions (`ci.yml`) triggering sandboxed runtime automation instantly on the remote cloud orchestration engine for every push. |
-| 🟢 **Done** | | Dockerization | Optimized `Dockerfile` (`python:3.12-slim`) with isolated layers caching and `requirements.txt` execution for deterministic, environment-agnostic runs. |
+| **Done** | **1. Test Planning** | `test-plan_week_004.md` | Comprehensive architectural documentation mapping test suite objectives, tools (Python, Pytest, Requests), execution scope, and explicit completion criteria. |
+| **Done** | | Scenarios Mapping | Exhaustive list of target endpoints, positive paths, negative validations, and contract boundary conditions structured prior to core refactoring. |
+| **Done** | **2. Test Expansion** | Users Endpoint | Maintained and evolved the legacy functional validations from Week 3 incrementally, avoiding regression. |
+| **Done** | | Login Validation | Complete coverage of authentication mechanisms including happy paths, wrong passwords, non-existent entities, and empty fields. |
+| **Done** | | Products Management | Full integration flow covering listing, schema validations, query-by-ID, updates, and cascading teardowns (deletions). |
+| **Done** | | Dynamic Auth Flow | Clean handling of Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), automatically generating and distributing administrator tokens to protected endpoints. |
+| **Done** | **3. Metrics & Reports** | English Execution | Main repository documentation completely written in English, maintaining industry standards for open-source and professional setups. |
+| **Done** | | Coverage Framework | Clear mathematical analysis outlining total endpoints tested vs. available API pathways, using the reference article matrix. |
+| **Done** | | Boundary Definitions | Fully documented constraints, explicitly stating which edge-case responses or third-party scopes were excluded with technical justifications. |
+| **Done** | **4. Defect Tracking** | Real Bugs Discovery | Active scanning of the target infrastructure to reveal unexpected payload exceptions or implicit server crashes. |
+| **Done** | | GitHub Issues | Standardized bug report logs opened on the repository containing clear severity indexing, reproduction steps, expected behaviors, and raw console payloads. |
+| **Done** | **5. Infrastructure** | Contract Verification | Integration of `pytest-schema` validating server payloads against strict architectural data types for at least 3 separate endpoints. |
+| **Done** | | GitHub Actions (CI) | Workflow definitions (`ci.yml`) triggering sandboxed runtime automation instantly on the remote cloud orchestration engine for every push. |
+| **Done** | | Dockerization | Optimized `Dockerfile` (`python:3.12-slim`) with isolated layers caching and `requirements.txt` execution for deterministic, environment-agnostic runs. |
 
 ---