Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 13, 2025. It is now read-only.

Replace usage of TransactionTestCase#1183

Merged
Swatinem merged 4 commits intomainfrom
swatinem/no-trxtest
Mar 17, 2025
Merged

Replace usage of TransactionTestCase#1183
Swatinem merged 4 commits intomainfrom
swatinem/no-trxtest

Conversation

@Swatinem
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Swatinem Swatinem commented Mar 3, 2025

The TransactionTestCase is documented to be a bit slower than the normal one, and someone mentioned recently that this might be the reason why API tests are taking so long.

So lets try changing that, and see whether the testsuite still works :-)

@Swatinem Swatinem requested a review from a team March 3, 2025 11:51
@Swatinem Swatinem self-assigned this Mar 3, 2025
@Swatinem Swatinem requested a review from a team as a code owner March 3, 2025 11:51
@Swatinem Swatinem force-pushed the swatinem/no-trxtest branch from 4be8678 to 8781c63 Compare March 11, 2025 12:03
@overwatch-beta
Copy link
Copy Markdown

overwatch-beta bot commented Mar 11, 2025

🚨 Sentry detected 8 potential issues in your recent changes 🚨

Lower risk findings

@codecov-notifications
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-notifications bot commented Mar 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.86%. Comparing base (8d9cd04) to head (8a3d079).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1183      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.87%   95.86%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         493      493              
  Lines       16880    16871       -9     
==========================================
- Hits        16183    16174       -9     
  Misses        697      697              
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 95.86% <100.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

The `TransactionTestCase` is documented to be a bit slower than the normal one, and someone mentioned recently that this might be the reason why API tests are taking so long.

So lets try changing that, and see whether the testsuite still works :-)
@Swatinem Swatinem force-pushed the swatinem/no-trxtest branch from fc66113 to 8a3d079 Compare March 13, 2025 12:05
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ajay-sentry ajay-sentry left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

tempted to say send it

@Swatinem
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This has been baking on API staging for a while, so I think we are good here :-)

@Swatinem Swatinem added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 17, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Mar 17, 2025
@Swatinem Swatinem added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 17, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 786d94a Mar 17, 2025
46 of 49 checks passed
@Swatinem Swatinem deleted the swatinem/no-trxtest branch March 17, 2025 14:54
@JerrySentry JerrySentry restored the swatinem/no-trxtest branch March 18, 2025 21:08
JerrySentry added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2025
@seer-by-sentry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ Sentry found no issues in your recent changes ✅

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants