fix: pass repoid to get_appropriate_storage_service

[joseph-sentry]

if we don't pass the repoid, then it won't check the feature flag, and it will be stuck on the old implementation

so it's possible that somewhere else the file is being written using the new implementation, so this will fail to decompress it properly

this is just temporary until we hardcode the new impl to be the default

[seer-by-sentry]

🚨 Sentry detected 10 potential issues in your recent changes 🚨

Lower risk findings

• 1% chance WARNING at Line 196, upload/views/bundle_analysis.py:
• 1% chance WARNING at Line 196, upload/views/bundle_analysis.py:
• 1% chance WARNING at Line 509, services/bundle_analysis.py:
• 1% chance WARNING at Line 70, upload/views/test_results.py:
• 1% chance WARNING at Line 70, upload/views/test_results.py:
• 1% chance WARNING at Line 70, upload/views/test_results.py:
• 1% chance WARNING at Line 73, upload/views/test_results.py:
• 1% chance WARNING at Line 73, upload/views/test_results.py:
• 1% chance WARNING at Line 196, upload/views/bundle_analysis.py:
• 1% chance WARNING at Line 39, upload/views/test_results.py:

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.87%. Comparing base (0fbad61) to head (c790a32).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1209   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.87%   95.87%           
=======================================
  Files         493      493           
  Lines       16880    16880           
=======================================
  Hits        16183    16183           
  Misses        697      697           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	95.87% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.