Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 13, 2025. It is now read-only.

Remove usage of additional Report.get arguments#1210

Merged
Swatinem merged 1 commit intomainfrom
swatinem/rm-getelse
Mar 14, 2025
Merged

Remove usage of additional Report.get arguments#1210
Swatinem merged 1 commit intomainfrom
swatinem/rm-getelse

Conversation

@Swatinem
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I’m about to remove the additional arguments to Report.get, so lets first remove any remaining usage.

I’m about to remove the additional arguments to `Report.get`, so lets first remove any remaining usage.
@Swatinem Swatinem self-assigned this Mar 13, 2025
@Swatinem Swatinem requested a review from a team as a code owner March 13, 2025 10:01
@Swatinem Swatinem enabled auto-merge March 13, 2025 10:01
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Mar 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.87%. Comparing base (8d9cd04) to head (5041d84).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1210   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.87%   95.87%           
=======================================
  Files         493      493           
  Lines       16880    16880           
=======================================
  Hits        16183    16183           
  Misses        697      697           
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 95.87% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Swatinem Swatinem added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 14, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit a74ce80 Mar 14, 2025
25 of 27 checks passed
@Swatinem Swatinem deleted the swatinem/rm-getelse branch March 14, 2025 15:06
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants