⚡️ Speed up method JitDecoratorDetector._is_jit_decorator by 16% in PR #1048 (better-jit-detection)#1049
Closed
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
The optimized code achieves a **15% speedup** by eliminating function call overhead and reducing redundant list operations in the hot path (`_check_attribute_decorator`).
## Key Optimizations
### 1. **Inlined Attribute Chain Extraction** (Biggest Impact)
The original code called `_get_attribute_parts(node)` which incurred function call overhead and created a full list with reversal. The optimized version inlines this logic directly in `_check_attribute_decorator`, building the `parts` list in reverse order from the start. This eliminates:
- Function call overhead (~44% of original method time)
- One list reversal operation
- Early exit opportunities when `current` is not a Name
**Performance impact**: The line profiler shows `_check_attribute_decorator` improved from 2.23ms to 2.05ms (8% faster), with the inlined attribute extraction taking only 3.8% of method time vs the original 44.2% spent in the function call.
### 2. **Dictionary Lookup Caching**
Both `_check_name_decorator` and `_check_attribute_decorator` now use `.get()` to cache the alias lookup result instead of doing `in` check followed by dictionary access. This reduces two dictionary operations to one:
```python
# Original: 2 dict operations
if name not in self.import_aliases: # lookup 1
return False
module, imported_name = self.import_aliases[name] # lookup 2
# Optimized: 1 dict operation
alias_info = self.import_aliases.get(name) # single lookup
if alias_info is None:
return False
module, imported_name = alias_info
```
### 3. **Streamlined List Operations**
The original code created `rest_parts = parts[1:]` (a list slice) and then accessed `rest_parts[-1]` and `rest_parts[:-1]` multiple times. The optimized version:
- Keeps `parts` in reverse order (decorator name at index 0)
- Accesses `decorator_name = parts[0]` directly
- Only reverses sub-slices when building module paths (`reversed(parts[1:])`)
This reduces memory allocations and improves cache locality.
## Test Case Performance
The optimization performs best on:
- **Attribute decorator tests** with module aliases (e.g., `@nb.jit`): **31.6% faster**
- **Unknown decorator checks**: **20-32% faster** due to early exit optimization
- **Large-scale tests** with many aliases: **19.7% faster** showing the optimization scales well
Some simple name decorator cases are slightly slower (2-6%) due to the additional `.get()` overhead, but these are not the dominant workload based on the profiler showing attribute decorators consume 79.4% of total time.
## Impact on Workloads
This optimization is particularly valuable for codebases that:
- Use attribute-based JIT decorators extensively (e.g., `@numba.jit`, `@torch.jit.script`)
- Have many import aliases that need to be resolved
- Perform static analysis on large codebases where this detector runs frequently
The 15% overall speedup comes primarily from optimizing the hot path in `_check_attribute_decorator`, which handles the most common and expensive decorator patterns.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #1048
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
better-jit-detection.📄 16% (0.16x) speedup for
JitDecoratorDetector._is_jit_decoratorincodeflash/code_utils/line_profile_utils.py⏱️ Runtime :
411 microseconds→355 microseconds(best of178runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 15% speedup by eliminating function call overhead and reducing redundant list operations in the hot path (
_check_attribute_decorator).Key Optimizations
1. Inlined Attribute Chain Extraction (Biggest Impact)
The original code called
_get_attribute_parts(node)which incurred function call overhead and created a full list with reversal. The optimized version inlines this logic directly in_check_attribute_decorator, building thepartslist in reverse order from the start. This eliminates:currentis not a NamePerformance impact: The line profiler shows
_check_attribute_decoratorimproved from 2.23ms to 2.05ms (8% faster), with the inlined attribute extraction taking only 3.8% of method time vs the original 44.2% spent in the function call.2. Dictionary Lookup Caching
Both
_check_name_decoratorand_check_attribute_decoratornow use.get()to cache the alias lookup result instead of doingincheck followed by dictionary access. This reduces two dictionary operations to one:3. Streamlined List Operations
The original code created
rest_parts = parts[1:](a list slice) and then accessedrest_parts[-1]andrest_parts[:-1]multiple times. The optimized version:partsin reverse order (decorator name at index 0)decorator_name = parts[0]directlyreversed(parts[1:]))This reduces memory allocations and improves cache locality.
Test Case Performance
The optimization performs best on:
@nb.jit): 31.6% fasterSome simple name decorator cases are slightly slower (2-6%) due to the additional
.get()overhead, but these are not the dominant workload based on the profiler showing attribute decorators consume 79.4% of total time.Impact on Workloads
This optimization is particularly valuable for codebases that:
@numba.jit,@torch.jit.script)The 15% overall speedup comes primarily from optimizing the hot path in
_check_attribute_decorator, which handles the most common and expensive decorator patterns.✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Click to see Generated Regression Tests
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr1048-2026-01-14T01.50.34and push.