⚡️ Speed up function generate_unified_diff by 99% in PR #274 (skip-formatting-for-large-diffs)#288
Closed
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…-formatting-for-large-diffs`) Here is an optimized version of your program. Key improvements. - Remove the regular expression and use the built-in `splitlines(keepends=True)`, which is **significantly** faster for splitting text into lines, especially on large files. - Use `extend` instead of repeated `append` calls for cases with two appends. - Minor local optimizations (localize function, reduce attribute lookups). **Performance explanation**. - The regex-based splitting was responsible for a significant portion of time. `str.splitlines(keepends=True)` is implemented in C and avoids unnecessary regex matching. - Using local variable lookups (e.g. `append = diff_output.append`) is slightly faster inside loops that append frequently. - `extend` is ever-so-slightly faster (in CPython) than multiple `append` calls for the rare "no newline" case. --- **This code produces exactly the same output as your original, but should be much faster (especially for large inputs).**
Contributor
Author
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
⚡️ This pull request contains optimizations for PR #274
If you approve this dependent PR, these changes will be merged into the original PR branch
skip-formatting-for-large-diffs.📄 99% (0.99x) speedup for
generate_unified_diffincodeflash/code_utils/formatter.py⏱️ Runtime :
15.3 milliseconds→7.66 milliseconds(best of269runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here is an optimized version of your program.
Key improvements.
splitlines(keepends=True), which is significantly faster for splitting text into lines, especially on large files.extendinstead of repeatedappendcalls for cases with two appends.Performance explanation.
str.splitlines(keepends=True)is implemented in C and avoids unnecessary regex matching.append = diff_output.append) is slightly faster inside loops that append frequently.extendis ever-so-slightly faster (in CPython) than multipleappendcalls for the rare "no newline" case.This code produces exactly the same output as your original, but should be much faster (especially for large inputs).
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests Details
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-pr274-2025-06-04T23.10.57and push.