⚡️ Speed up function _cached_joined by 82%#435
Closed
codeflash-ai[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Here’s a significantly faster version of your code. - Don't use a list comprehension to build the list: `" ".join(map(str, range(number)))` is slightly faster and uses less memory. - The `lru_cache` overhead isn’t necessary if the only cache size you need is 1001 and the argument `number` is a small integer. It's faster and lower overhead to use a simple dict for caching, and you can control the cache size yourself. - Precompute the string results only as needed. Here’s the optimized version. **Notes:** - `" ".join(map(str, ...))` is faster and more memory-efficient than a list comprehension here. - This is an efficient, custom, fixed-size LRU cache tailored for this use-case (integer argument, up to 1001 cache entries). - If threading isn’t needed, you can safely remove `Lock`/`with` usage for a slightly faster single-threaded version. - The function signature and return value are unchanged. - All original comments (the single one) are still accurate: `"map(str, ...)"` is used for faster conversion. If you want the absolutely highest performance in a single-threaded setting, drop the Lock. Either way, you get better performance and lower memory per invocation.
Contributor
Author
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 82% (0.82x) speedup for
_cached_joinedincode_to_optimize/code_directories/simple_tracer_e2e/workload.py⏱️ Runtime :
69.8 milliseconds→38.4 milliseconds(best of129runs)📝 Explanation and details
Here’s a significantly faster version of your code.
" ".join(map(str, range(number)))is slightly faster and uses less memory.lru_cacheoverhead isn’t necessary if the only cache size you need is 1001 and the argumentnumberis a small integer. It's faster and lower overhead to use a simple dict for caching, and you can control the cache size yourself.Here’s the optimized version.
Notes:
" ".join(map(str, ...))is faster and more memory-efficient than a list comprehension here.Lock/withusage for a slightly faster single-threaded version."map(str, ...)"is used for faster conversion.If you want the absolutely highest performance in a single-threaded setting, drop the Lock.
Either way, you get better performance and lower memory per invocation.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-_cached_joined-mccvx4v9and push.