You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: ballotQuestions/2024/23-12.yaml
+64-17Lines changed: 64 additions & 17 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -10,22 +10,69 @@ ballotQuestionNumber: 5
10
10
relatedBillIds: []
11
11
description: null
12
12
atAGlance: null
13
-
fullSummary: |-
13
+
voteEffectYes: "A YES VOTE would increase the minimum hourly wage an employer must pay a tipped worker to the full state minimum wage implemented over five years, at which point employers could pool all tips and distribute them to all non-management workers."
14
+
voteEffectNo: "A NO VOTE would make no change in the law governing tip pooling or the minimum wage for tipped workers. "
15
+
fiscalConsequences: "There are no direct fiscal consequences on the Commonwealth or municipalities because they generally do not employ tipped employees. Nevertheless, this measure will affect proposed state and municipal revenues and expenditures due to impacts on employee and business income and earnings. While those impacts are difficult to project due to the lack of reliable data, increasing the minimum hourly wage of tipped employees will likely increase state income tax collections because employees will earn more in hourly wages from which state income tax is withheld. The impacts on gratuity earnings and gratuity tax reporting are unknown."
16
+
inFavor: |-
17
+
Vote Yes for FAIRNESS. It’s fair for Workers: Instead of being paid the
18
+
current tipped worker wage of just $6.75 an hour, Massachusetts tipped workers
19
+
deserve the full minimum wage with tips on top. Workers in 7 other states earn
20
+
a full wage plus tips, and they enjoy robust tips and growing restaurants where
21
+
menu prices are comparable to Massachusetts. This law would create greater
22
+
financial stability and predictability, acknowledging workers’ skills and
23
+
professionalism. It’s fair for Employers: Many Massachusetts small businesses
24
+
are already paying the full minimum wage plus tips. Big restaurant
25
+
corporations should do the same. This would reduce employee turnover and
26
+
improve service quality. It’s fair for Consumers: Big restaurant corporations
27
+
are not paying their fair share and are forcing consumers to cover their
28
+
employees’ wages through tips. Tips should be a reward for good service, not a
29
+
subsidy for low wages paid by large corporations. Estefania Galvis One Fair
30
+
Wage 11 Converse Ave Malden, MA 02148 813-898-9136 www.yeson5ma.com
31
+
supportCommittee: "One Fair Wage Plus Tips MA Committee 95513"
32
+
opposeCommittee: "Committee to Protect Tips 95521"
33
+
against: |-
34
+
This question is funded by a radical group from California. Tipped employees
35
+
have made it abundantly clear the way they earn money does not need to be
36
+
changed. State and Federal law guarantee them the $15 hourly minimum wage
37
+
with many earning over $40/hr and 90% reporting at least $20/hr. A recent
38
+
survey also showed that 88% oppose ‘tip pools’ where tips are shared with
39
+
non-service employees and 90% believe that if tipped wages are eliminated,
40
+
they will earn less. Other attempts to implement this have seen catastrophic
41
+
results. In Washington, D.C., nearly 10% of tipped employees have lost or
42
+
left their jobs. This follows increases in menu prices, the implementation of
43
+
20% ‘service fees’ and a wave of closures. This would reduce overall wages
44
+
for servers, increase costs for restaurants and skyrocket the cost of eating
45
+
out. It will be disastrous with many neighborhood restaurants being forced to
46
+
close. Doug Bacon Former Server and Bartender, Current Restaurant Owner
47
+
Committee to Protect Tips 160 E Main St # 2 Westborough, MA 01581
48
+
www.ProtectTips.org
49
+
campaignFinancials:
50
+
support:
51
+
- cashRaised: 889526.25
52
+
spent: 889526.25
53
+
inKind: 1036954.37
54
+
oppose:
55
+
- cashRaised: 2518234.24
56
+
spent: 2518234.24
57
+
inKind: 658123.44
58
+
fullSummary: >-
14
59
This proposed law would gradually increase the minimum hourly wage an
15
-
employer must pay a tipped worker, over the course of five years, on the following
16
-
schedule: - To 64% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2025; - To 73% of
17
-
the state minimum wage on January 1, 2026; - To 82% of the state minimum wage
18
-
on January 1, 2027; - To 91% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2028; and
19
-
- To 100% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2029. The proposed law
20
-
would require employers to continue to pay tipped workers the difference between
21
-
the state minimum wage and the total amount a tipped worker receives in hourly
22
-
wages plus tips through the end of 2028. The proposed law would also permit
23
-
employers to calculate this difference over the entire weekly or bi-weekly payroll
24
-
period. The requirement to pay this difference would cease when the required
25
-
hourly wage for tipped workers would become 100% of the state minimum wage
26
-
on January 1, 2029. Under the proposed law, if an employer pays its workers an
27
-
hourly wage that is at least the state minimum wage, the employer would be
28
-
permitted to administer a “tip pool” that combines all the tips given by customers to
29
-
tipped workers and distributes them among all the workers, including non-tipped
30
-
workers.
60
+
employer must pay a tipped worker, over the course of five years, on the
61
+
following schedule:
62
+
• To 64% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2025;
63
+
• To 73% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2026;
64
+
• To 82% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2027;
65
+
• To 91% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2028; and
66
+
• To 100% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2029.
67
+
The proposed law would require employers to continue to pay tipped workers
68
+
the difference between the state minimum wage and the total amount a tipped
69
+
worker receives in hourly wages plus tips through the end of 2028. The
70
+
proposed law would also permit employers to calculate this difference over the
71
+
entire weekly or bi-weekly payroll period. The requirement to pay this
72
+
difference would cease when the required hourly wage for tipped workers would
73
+
become 100% of the state minimum wage on January 1, 2029. Under the
74
+
proposed law, if an employer pays its workers an hourly wage that is at least
75
+
the state minimum wage, the employer would be permitted to administer a “tip
76
+
pool” that combines all the tips given by customers to tipped workers and
77
+
distributes them among all the workers, including non-tipped workers.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: ballotQuestions/2024/23-13.yaml
+89-51Lines changed: 89 additions & 51 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -10,57 +10,95 @@ ballotQuestionNumber: 4
10
10
relatedBillIds: []
11
11
description: null
12
12
atAGlance: null
13
-
fullSummary: |-
14
-
This proposed law would allow persons aged 21 and older to grow, possess, and
15
-
use certain natural psychedelic substances in certain circumstances. The psychedelic
16
-
substances allowed would be two substances found in mushrooms (psilocybin and
17
-
psilocyn) and three substances found in plants (dimethyltryptamine, mescaline, and
18
-
ibogaine). These substances could be purchased at an approved location for use under the
19
-
supervision of a licensed facilitator. This proposed law would otherwise prohibit any retail
20
-
sale of natural psychedelic substances. This proposed law would also provide for the
13
+
voteEffectYes: "A YES VOTE would allow persons over age 21 to use certain natural psychedelic substances under licensed supervision and to grow and possess limited quantities of those substances in their home, and would create a commission to regulate those substances."
14
+
voteEffectNo: "A NO VOTE would make no change in the law regarding natural psychedelic substances."
15
+
fiscalConsequences: "This measure would establish a 15% state excise tax for the sale of natural psychedelic substances, which would be available for spending from a dedicated fund; however, the revenue generating impact is unknown due to the lack of data for the new market being proposed. This measure would also allow for a local tax option that could generate local sales tax revenue. This measure would also create an oversight commission that would require dedicated resources to execute its duties and responsibilities. The costs of establishing and operating the commission would need to be developed and would be subject to appropriation."
16
+
inFavor: |-
17
+
Vote YES on 4 to provide safe, regulated access to promising natural
18
+
psychedelic medicines for treatment-resistant PTSD, anxiety, and depression.
19
+
Psychedelics will be available in approved therapeutic settings under the
20
+
supervision of trained and licensed facilitators, NOT sold in stores to take
21
+
home.
22
+
supportCommittee: "Massachusetts for Mental Health Options 95505"
23
+
opposeCommittee: "Coalition for Safe Communities 95522"
24
+
against: |-
25
+
MEDICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH PROFESSIONALS, VETERANS, AND RECOVERY GROUPS URGE
26
+
NO ON QUESTION 4. Research from leading medical institutions including Mass
27
+
General Brigham, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, and Johns Hopkins shows that
28
+
psychedelic medicines can be effective treatments for depression and anxiety.
29
+
In fact, the FDA recently granted psilocybin a “breakthrough therapy”
30
+
designation. For many people who are suffering, daily medications and other
31
+
standard treatments aren’t working. Over 6,000 veterans die by suicide
32
+
annually, and countless more struggle from service-related trauma. Natural
33
+
psychedelic medicine can also offer patients with a terminal diagnosis relief
34
+
from end-of-life anxiety and help them find peace. That’s why question 4 is
35
+
supported by doctors, mental health providers, and veteran advocates. Vote YES
36
+
to expand mental health options. Lieutenant Sarko Gergerian, Mental Health
37
+
Counselor (MHC) Massachusetts for Mental Health Options 14 Sullivan Street
38
+
Boston, MA 02129 781-205-9737 https://maformentalhealth.org
39
+
campaignFinancials:
40
+
support:
41
+
- cashRaised: 7752198.94
42
+
spent: 7752198.94
43
+
inKind: 1246724.32
44
+
oppose:
45
+
- cashRaised: 137072.5
46
+
spent: 129158.9
47
+
inKind: 0
48
+
fullSummary: >-
49
+
This proposed law would allow persons aged 21 and older to grow, possess,
50
+
and use certain natural psychedelic substances in certain circumstances. The
51
+
psychedelic substances allowed would be two substances found in mushrooms
52
+
(psilocybin and psilocyn) and three substances found in plants
53
+
(dimethyltryptamine, mescaline, and ibogaine). These substances could be
54
+
purchased at an approved location for use under the supervision of a licensed
55
+
facilitator. This proposed law would otherwise prohibit any retail sale of
56
+
natural psychedelic substances. This proposed law would also provide for the
21
57
regulation and taxation of these psychedelic substances.
22
-
23
-
This proposed law would license and regulate facilities offering supervised use of
24
-
these psychedelic substances and provide for the taxation of proceeds from those facilities’
25
-
sales of psychedelic substances. It would also allow persons aged 21 and older to grow
26
-
these psychedelic substances in a 12-foot by 12-foot area at their home and use these
27
-
psychedelic substances at their home. This proposed law would authorize persons aged 21
28
-
or older to possess up to one gram of psilocybin, one gram of psilocyn, one gram of
29
-
dimethyltryptamine, 18 grams of mescaline, and 30 grams of ibogaine (“personal use
30
-
amount”), in addition to whatever they might grow at their home, and to give away up to
31
-
the personal use amount to a person aged 21 or over.
32
-
33
-
This proposed law would create a Natural Psychedelic Substances Commission of
34
-
five members appointed by the Governor, Attorney General, and Treasurer which would
35
-
administer the law governing the use and distribution of these psychedelic substances. The
36
-
Commission would adopt regulations governing licensing qualifications, security,
37
-
recordkeeping, education and training, health and safety requirements, testing, and age
38
-
verification. This proposed law would also create a Natural Psychedelic Substances
39
-
Advisory Board of 20 members appointed by the Governor, Attorney General, and
40
-
Treasurer which would study and make recommendations to the Commission on the
41
-
regulation and taxation of these psychedelic substances.
42
-
43
-
This proposed law would allow cities and towns to reasonably restrict the time,
44
-
place, and manner of the operation of licensed facilities offering psychedelic substances,
45
-
but cities and towns could not ban those facilities or their provision of these substances.
58
+
This proposed law would license and regulate facilities offering supervised use
59
+
of these psychedelic substances and provide for the taxation of proceeds from
60
+
those facilities’ sales of psychedelic substances. It would also allow persons
61
+
aged 21 and older to grow these psychedelic substances in a 12-foot by
62
+
12-foot area at their home and use these psychedelic substances at their
63
+
home. This proposed law would authorize persons aged 21 or older to possess
64
+
up to one gram of psilocybin, one gram of psilocyn, one gram of
65
+
dimethyltryptamine, 18 grams of mescaline, and 30 grams of ibogaine
66
+
(“personal use amount”), in addition to whatever they might grow at their
67
+
home, and to give away up to the personal use amount to a person aged 21 or
68
+
over.
69
+
This proposed law would create a Natural Psychedelic Substances Commission
70
+
of five members appointed by the Governor, Attorney General, and Treasurer
71
+
which would administer the law governing the use and distribution of these
72
+
psychedelic substances. The Commission would adopt regulations governing
73
+
licensing qualifications, security, recordkeeping, education and training,
74
+
health and safety requirements, testing, and age verification. This proposed
75
+
law would also create a Natural Psychedelic Substances Advisory Board of 20
76
+
members appointed by the Governor, Attorney General, and Treasurer which
77
+
would study and make recommendations to the Commission on the regulation
78
+
and taxation of these psychedelic substances.
79
+
This proposed law would allow cities and towns to reasonably restrict the
80
+
time, place, and manner of the operation of licensed facilities offering
81
+
psychedelic substances, but cities and towns could not ban those facilities or
82
+
their provision of these substances.
46
83
The proceeds of sales of psychedelic substances at licensed facilities would be
47
-
subject to the state sales tax and an additional excise tax of 15 percent. In addition, a city or
48
-
town could impose a separate tax of up to two percent. Revenue received from the
49
-
additional state excise tax, license application fees, and civil penalties for violations of this
50
-
proposed law would be deposited in a Natural Psychedelic Substances Regulation Fund
51
-
and would be used, subject to appropriation, for administration of this proposed law.
52
-
Using the psychedelic substances as permitted by this proposed law could not be a
53
-
basis to deny a person medical care or public assistance, impose discipline by a
54
-
professional licensing board, or enter adverse orders in child custody cases absent clear
55
-
and convincing evidence that the activities created an unreasonable danger to the safety of
56
-
a minor child.
57
-
58
-
This proposed law would not affect existing laws regarding the operation of motor
59
-
vehicles while under the influence, or the ability of employers to enforce workplace
60
-
policies restricting the consumption of these psychedelic substances by employees. This
61
-
proposed law would allow property owners to prohibit the use, display, growing,
62
-
processing, or sale of these psychedelic substances on their premises. State and local governments could continue to restrict the possession and use of these psychedelic
63
-
substances in public buildings or at schools.
64
-
65
-
This proposed law would take effect on December 15, 2024
84
+
subject to the state sales tax and an additional excise tax of 15 percent. In
85
+
addition, a city or town could impose a separate tax of up to two percent.
86
+
Revenue received from the additional state excise tax, license application
87
+
fees, and civil penalties for violations of this proposed law would be deposited
88
+
in a Natural Psychedelic Substances Regulation Fund and would be used,
89
+
subject to appropriation, for administration of this proposed law.
90
+
Using the psychedelic substances as permitted by this proposed law could not
91
+
be a basis to deny a person medical care or public assistance, impose
92
+
discipline by a professional licensing board, or enter adverse orders in child
93
+
custody cases absent clear and convincing evidence that the activities created
94
+
an unreasonable danger to the safety of a minor child.
95
+
This proposed law would not affect existing laws regarding the operation of
96
+
motor vehicles while under the influence, or the ability of employers to
97
+
enforce workplace policies restricting the consumption of these psychedelic
98
+
substances by employees. This proposed law would allow property owners to
99
+
prohibit the use, display, growing, processing, or sale of these psychedelic
100
+
substances on their premises. State and local governments could continue to
101
+
restrict the possession and use of these psychedelic substances in public
102
+
buildings or at schools.
103
+
This proposed law would take effect on December 15, 2024.
0 commit comments