There is no widely adopted, open metadata standard for describing digital services (SaaS, hosted open source, or freely accessible services), comparable to DCAT for datasets. This makes consistent cataloging and comparison difficult.
This issue tracks research into existing standards and the possible definition of a lightweight, DCAT-like metadata profile for services, suitable for catalogs such as opendiensten.nl.
Goal
-
Assess existing standards (e.g. DCAT, Schema.org, ITSM service catalogs, TOSCA, OpenAPI, SPDX)
-
Identify gaps
-
Propose a minimal, reusable metadata model for describing services
There is no widely adopted, open metadata standard for describing digital services (SaaS, hosted open source, or freely accessible services), comparable to DCAT for datasets. This makes consistent cataloging and comparison difficult.
This issue tracks research into existing standards and the possible definition of a lightweight, DCAT-like metadata profile for services, suitable for catalogs such as opendiensten.nl.
Goal
Assess existing standards (e.g. DCAT, Schema.org, ITSM service catalogs, TOSCA, OpenAPI, SPDX)
Identify gaps
Propose a minimal, reusable metadata model for describing services