Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
26 lines (23 loc) · 2.02 KB

File metadata and controls

26 lines (23 loc) · 2.02 KB

COCOA vs. graphify

graphify popularized the "index your repo into a queryable graph" workflow for AI agents — one-command setup, three artifacts, token-efficient queries. COCOA adopts that exact UX and changes one thing: where the edges come from.

graphify COCOA
Unit of understanding a folder of files a distributed system
Edge derivation tree-sitter AST for code (deterministic); LLM inference for docs/PDFs/images real analyzers (WALA, Jedi, ts-morph, go/types via CLDK) + proto/k8s stitching
Edge provenance EXTRACTED / INFERRED / AMBIGUOUS DERIVED-STATIC / INFERRED (labeled fallback only)
Cross-language links inferred by the model derived: proto stubs ↔ handlers ↔ k8s wiring, with anchor-exclusivity and boundary-matching to prevent false edges
Databases absent first-class: Redis ops, SQL tables, ORM mappings as graph nodes/edges
k8s manifests more files in the graph a topology source (raw YAML + helm template + kustomize build)
Impact queries neighborhood lookups cross-service blast radius with strongest-path provenance semantics
Coverage honesty n/a every unanalyzed service recorded with a reason; truncation always labeled
Artifacts graph.json / graph.html / GRAPH_REPORT.md system-graph.json / system-map.html / SYSTEM_REPORT.md
Token efficiency ~1.7k/query vs ~123k naive (their number) same persisted-graph mechanism; cocoa demo measures ~25,000× on Online Boutique (estimate, printed per run)

The trade: graphify covers 36 grammars and multi-modal inputs (docs, PDFs, images) today; COCOA covers the languages with real analyzers (Java/Python/JS/TS shipped, Go built-from-source in Docker, C# pending) and only code + configs. If you need breadth-first repo Q&A, graphify is excellent. If an agent is about to change a distributed system and needs to know what breaks — edges that are derived, labeled, and complete-or-disclosed matter. That's COCOA.