Skip to content

dummy pr#1235

Closed
rsoaresd wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
test-ci
Closed

dummy pr#1235
rsoaresd wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
test-ci

Conversation

@rsoaresd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@rsoaresd rsoaresd commented Dec 16, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Dashboard UI end-to-end tests now execute consistently on all continuous integration builds.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from fbm3307 and metlos December 16, 2025 10:21
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Dec 16, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rsoaresd

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Dec 16, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request removes conditional logic from make/test.mk that previously gated the UI E2E devsandbox-dashboard tests on CI based on the REPO_NAME variable. The tests now execute unconditionally when CI=true, eliminating the selective skip behavior for the toolchain-e2e repository.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI test configuration
make/test.mk
Removed ifeq conditional block that gated test-devsandbox-dashboard-e2e invocation on REPO_NAME; E2E tests now run unconditionally on CI

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

  • Single-file change with straightforward conditional removal
  • Key consideration: Verify that removing the REPO_NAME guard is intentional and won't adversely affect toolchain-e2e CI workflows

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • alexeykazakov
  • MatousJobanek

Poem

🐰 A gate once stood, now cast away,
The tests shall run both night and day!
No more the REPO_NAME decree,
Dashboard E2E runs wild and free! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'dummy pr' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive terminology that does not convey meaningful information about the actual changes made to the codebase. Replace 'dummy pr' with a descriptive title that reflects the main change, such as 'Remove conditional gating for UI E2E devsandbox-dashboard tests on CI' or 'Always run devsandbox-dashboard E2E tests in CI'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch test-ci

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b1147e8 and 661781c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • make/test.mk (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • make/test.mk
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Unit Tests
  • GitHub Check: Build & push operator bundles & dashboard image for e2e tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@rsoaresd rsoaresd closed this Dec 16, 2025
@rsoaresd rsoaresd deleted the test-ci branch December 16, 2025 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant