You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: README.md
+1-1Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Numerical approaches can be broadly classified into:
40
40
-**High-fidelity solvers** that resolve the Navier–Stokes equations with all flow physics, and
41
41
-**Reduced-order models** based on simplifying assumptions that retain key aerodynamic behavior at a fraction of the computational cost.
42
42
43
-
**PANKH** falls into the second category. It solves the **Laplace equation** under **potential flow assumptions**, making it ideal for low-speed, inviscid, incompressible, and irrotational flows.
43
+
**PANKH** falls into the second category of numerical studies. It solves the **Laplace equation** under **potential flow assumptions**, making it ideal for low-speed, inviscid, incompressible, and irrotational flows.
44
44
45
45
High-fidelity CFD solvers demand substantial computational resources — often running for **days on HPC clusters** across multiple nodes and cores. Moreover, **commercial CFD packages** are expensive, opaque “black-box” systems, making benchmark validations and modifications challenging.
0 commit comments