Add @font-face that combines normal and italic fonts

[quiple]

Currently, if you want to use both normal and italic fonts in your project using this package, you must manually specify each font family.

html {
  font-family: 'Geist-Variable';
}
i {
  font-family: 'Geist-VariableItalic';
}

Resolves the issue by adding a CSS file that merges font families into one.

The exports in package.json are redefined as follows:

• non.geist (added)
• non.geist -> non.geist/sans
• non.geist/italic
• non.geist/m (added)
• non.geist/mono
• non.geist/mono-italic

If there is a better suffix, please update.

Thanks for this package!

[contigen]

Hi. It's surprising that I am just seeing this today, pardon the very late response; I appreciate the intent/effort.

I say keeping the italic and normal font file separate is the better approach, the developer can pull in the italic font file only when strictly needed; or do you have a use case you are targeting?

You might want to check #1.

Thanks.

[quiple]

Thank you for checking.

As you can see, by setting font-style: italic; within the same font family, there's no need to manually specify the font family for tags like <i>. It will also correctly render italics across all elements where CSS font-style: italic; is applied.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/Reference/Properties/font-style

This is the default behavior for font services like Google Fonts as well: https://fonts.googleapis.com/css2?family=Roboto:ital,wght@0,100..900;1,100..900

Additionally, if you only need to load the italic style, you can still use non.geist/italic.

I understand the need to load each font individually. That is why the goal is to keep the current setup as-is while adding CSS to group both the regular and italic styles under the same font family.

Alternatively, removing "Italic" from the font-family name in the italic @font-face declaration would also solve the issue. However, I chose to add a new CSS instead to avoid any unforeseen side effects.

[contigen]

Hello. Did you check the possibility of #1 happening?

[contigen]

I'm occupied for now, I'll test tomorrow