Skip to content

chore: Publish release/20250708-8acb90#284

Merged
jackshen310 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/20250708-8acb90
Jul 8, 2025
Merged

chore: Publish release/20250708-8acb90#284
jackshen310 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/20250708-8acb90

Conversation

@jackshen310
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@jackshen310 jackshen310 commented Jul 8, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Resolved an issue where the Websocket was undefined in the application.
  • Chores

    • Updated package versions for improved tracking.
    • Added new changelog entries to document recent changes.

@CLAassistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.


shenxiaojie.316 seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 8, 2025

Walkthrough

This change updates the version numbers and changelogs for the @coze/api and @coze/uniapp-api packages, reflecting a patch release for each. It also deletes a JSON metadata file previously used to describe a patch for a Websocket-related issue.

Changes

Files Change Summary
packages/coze-js/CHANGELOG.json, packages/coze-js/CHANGELOG.md Added changelog entry for version 1.3.5 ("Publish for noop").
packages/coze-js/package.json Bumped version from 1.3.4 to 1.3.5.
packages/coze-uniapp/CHANGELOG.json, packages/coze-uniapp/CHANGELOG.md Added changelog entry for version 0.3.1 (Websocket undefined fix).
packages/coze-uniapp/package.json Bumped version from 0.3.0 to 0.3.1.
common/changes/@coze/uniapp-api/fix-uniappbug_2025-07-06-13-31.json Deleted patch metadata file describing Websocket undefined fix.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • DingGao-Devin

Poem

In the garden of code where the changelogs bloom,
A patch hops in, dispelling the gloom.
Websockets defined, and versions climb high,
With a whisper of "noop" as updates fly.
The rabbit records, with a flick of his ear—
Another release, another cheer!
🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/coze-js/CHANGELOG.md (1)

3-8: Changelog entry is too vague

“Publish for noop” provides no actionable context.
At minimum specify why a new patch was required (e.g., republish due to broken tarball, metadata fix). Clear changelogs help downstream maintainers decide on upgrades.

packages/coze-uniapp/CHANGELOG.md (1)

3-8: Consistent casing of “WebSocket”

Elsewhere in docs you use the proper “WebSocket”.
Keep terminology consistent:

- - fix Websocket undefined
+ - fix WebSocket undefined
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b2eb475 and 4aece21.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • common/changes/@coze/uniapp-api/fix-uniappbug_2025-07-06-13-31.json (0 hunks)
  • packages/coze-js/CHANGELOG.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/coze-js/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/coze-js/package.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/coze-uniapp/CHANGELOG.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/coze-uniapp/CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • packages/coze-uniapp/package.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • common/changes/@coze/uniapp-api/fix-uniappbug_2025-07-06-13-31.json
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
packages/coze-uniapp/package.json (1)
Learnt from: huntye1
PR: coze-dev/coze-js#25
File: codecov.yml:4-8
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:27:06.509Z
Learning: In the `coze-js` project, when configuring `codecov.yml`, prefer using default settings initially for stability unless there's a specific need to change them.
packages/coze-js/CHANGELOG.md (1)
Learnt from: huntye1
PR: coze-dev/coze-js#25
File: codecov.yml:4-8
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:27:06.509Z
Learning: In the `coze-js` project, when configuring `codecov.yml`, prefer using default settings initially for stability unless there's a specific need to change them.
packages/coze-js/package.json (1)
Learnt from: huntye1
PR: coze-dev/coze-js#25
File: codecov.yml:4-8
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:27:06.509Z
Learning: In the `coze-js` project, when configuring `codecov.yml`, prefer using default settings initially for stability unless there's a specific need to change them.
packages/coze-js/CHANGELOG.json (1)
Learnt from: huntye1
PR: coze-dev/coze-js#25
File: codecov.yml:4-8
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:27:06.509Z
Learning: In the `coze-js` project, when configuring `codecov.yml`, prefer using default settings initially for stability unless there's a specific need to change them.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
  • GitHub Check: Node.js v20 (ubuntu-latest)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
packages/coze-uniapp/package.json (2)

3-3: Missing lock-file update may break reproducible installs

The package version bumps to 0.3.1, but no accompanying lock-file (pnpm-lock.yaml, package-lock.json, etc.) is committed in this PR.
If the workspace is published from CI that installs from a clean clone, the lock file is required for deterministic dependency resolution—especially because you rely on workspace:* links.

Consider committing the updated lock-file or explicitly documenting why it is omitted (e.g., lock-files are generated in CI).


68-71: Overly strict peerDependency pin risks install conflicts

"@dcloudio/uni-app": "3.0.0-4030620241128001" is a pre-release build pinned to an exact version.
Consumers on a later 3.x build will hit an npm/yarn/ pnpm peer‐resolution error.

Unless you rely on that exact build, relax the range:

-    "@dcloudio/uni-app": "3.0.0-4030620241128001"
+    "@dcloudio/uni-app": "^3.0.0"

[ suggest_essential_refactor ]

packages/coze-js/package.json (1)

3-3: Patch release without code changes — double-check necessity

Version bumps increase maintenance overhead for consumers who track ^1.3.x.
Given the changelog entry “Publish for noop”, verify that:

  1. No generated artifacts (e.g., dist) changed.
  2. No transitive dependency resolutions differ.

If absolutely nothing changed, consider retracting the bump or merging it with the next meaningful patch.

packages/coze-js/CHANGELOG.json (1)

8-14: Confirmed existing “none” change type

The grep output shows that "none" is already used alongside "minor" and "patch" in packages/coze-js/CHANGELOG.json, so it’s supported by your current tooling. No changes needed here.

Comment thread packages/coze-uniapp/CHANGELOG.json
@jackshen310 jackshen310 added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 8, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 8a83c3d Jul 8, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@jackshen310 jackshen310 deleted the release/20250708-8acb90 branch July 8, 2025 06:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants