[feat][evaluation] add trace for evaluation

[gyccccc-test]

What type of PR is this?

Check the PR title

• This PR title match the format: [<type>][<scope>] <description>. For example: [fix][backend] flaky fix
• The description of this PR title is user-oriented and clear enough for others to understand.
• Add documentation if the current PR requires user awareness at the usage level.
• This PR is written in English. PRs not in English will not be reviewed.

(Optional) Translate the PR title into Chinese

(Optional) More detailed description for this PR(en: English/zh: Chinese)

en:
zh(optional):

(Optional) Which issue(s) this PR fixes

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.

---

[gaoyichen.16] seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.

---

[gaoyichen.16] seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...on/convertor/evaluation_set/evaluation_set_item.go	50.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (66.66%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #423      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.20%   71.20%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         624      624              
  Lines       62052    62055       +3     
==========================================
  Hits        44184    44184              
- Misses      14677    14679       +2     
- Partials     3191     3192       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	71.20% <66.66%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...es/evaluation/domain/entity/evaluation_set_item.go	72.72% <ø> (ø)
...ckend/modules/evaluation/infra/rpc/data/convert.go	44.23% <100.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️
...on/convertor/evaluation_set/evaluation_set_item.go	28.67% <50.00%> (+0.30%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 89fddc2...edfa31d. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.