Skip to content

[feat][evaluation] add trace_id for evaluation#425

Merged
gyccccc-test merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/eval_trace_merge
Feb 5, 2026
Merged

[feat][evaluation] add trace_id for evaluation#425
gyccccc-test merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/eval_trace_merge

Conversation

@gyccccc-test
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What type of PR is this?

Check the PR title

  • This PR title match the format: [<type>][<scope>] <description>. For example: [fix][backend] flaky fix
  • The description of this PR title is user-oriented and clear enough for others to understand.
  • Add documentation if the current PR requires user awareness at the usage level.
  • This PR is written in English. PRs not in English will not be reviewed.

(Optional) Translate the PR title into Chinese

(Optional) More detailed description for this PR(en: English/zh: Chinese)

en:
zh(optional):

(Optional) Which issue(s) this PR fixes

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Feb 5, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...on/convertor/evaluation_set/evaluation_set_item.go 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (66.66%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #425      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   71.20%   71.19%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         624      624              
  Lines       62052    62055       +3     
==========================================
- Hits        44184    44182       -2     
- Misses      14677    14680       +3     
- Partials     3191     3193       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 71.19% <66.66%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...es/evaluation/domain/entity/evaluation_set_item.go 72.72% <ø> (ø)
...ckend/modules/evaluation/infra/rpc/data/convert.go 44.23% <100.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
...on/convertor/evaluation_set/evaluation_set_item.go 28.67% <50.00%> (+0.30%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 89fddc2...8152009. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@gyccccc-test gyccccc-test merged commit 795a4f1 into main Feb 5, 2026
18 of 19 checks passed
@gyccccc-test gyccccc-test deleted the feat/eval_trace_merge branch February 5, 2026 14:21
HearyShen pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants