Skip to content

chore(release): v0.1.15#171

Merged
Andrei Kvapil (kvaps) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/v0.1.15
Jun 22, 2026
Merged

chore(release): v0.1.15#171
Andrei Kvapil (kvaps) merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
release/v0.1.15

Conversation

@kvaps

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Cut v0.1.15 — bugfix release with the two satellite/apiserver robustness fixes from #170 (zvol-device-wait mkfs race + RD GET cache-miss API-reader fallback), surfaced validating blockstor as the cozystack storage backend. Tagging v0.1.15 after merge triggers the release pipeline (3 ghcr images + GitHub Release from this CHANGELOG section).

Signed-off-by: Andrei Kvapil <kvapss@gmail.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@kvaps, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 57 minutes and 37 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has used up its prepaid credits, and credit purchases are no longer available. Enable the review add-on in the billing tab to keep reviews running — you're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, the refill rate gradually slows as usage increases. The highest same-day bursts are limited more strictly.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 78d017e8-5946-466a-a1a6-884cb186838b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0aaa840 and 52b59b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CHANGELOG.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch release/v0.1.15

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@kvaps Andrei Kvapil (kvaps) merged commit eb0b779 into main Jun 22, 2026
7 of 8 checks passed

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the CHANGELOG.md for the v0.1.15 bugfix release, detailing two robustness fixes: the satellite waiting for the backing zvol device to resolve a udev race, and the apiserver falling back to the direct API reader to prevent spurious 404s on cache-missed resource definitions. The review feedback suggests minor stylistic improvements in the changelog text, specifically capitalizing 'Cozystack' and 'Apiserver' for consistency, and correcting the hyphenation of 'resource definition'.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

Comment thread CHANGELOG.md

## v0.1.15 — 2026-06-22

Bugfix release. Two satellite/apiserver robustness fixes surfaced while validating blockstor as the cozystack storage backend (full heavy-app e2e on a 3-node Talos+QEMU stand). Primary backend focus: ZFS thin (zvol-backed).

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The project name Cozystack should be capitalized for consistency with other occurrences in the changelog (such as on line 153).

Comment thread CHANGELOG.md
### Fixed

- **Satellite waits for the backing zvol device before mkfs/attach (#170)** — on ZFS-thin, `zfs create` returns before udev has created the `/dev/zvol/...` device node, so the satellite's mkfs/attach could fire against a not-yet-present device and fail with "does not exist" on the first reconcile, leaving the volume unattached until a later retry. The satellite now polls the backing block device (`blockdev --getsize64`, with a best-effort `udevadm settle`) up to a bounded timeout before mkfs/attach, closing the zfs/udev race. Pinned at L1 (`reconciler_zvol_device_wait_test`, which fails on the pre-fix path).
- **apiserver resolves a cache-missed resource-definition via the direct API reader (#170)** — the apiserver runs multiple replicas with no leader election, so a `GET /v1/resource-definitions/{rd}` can load-balance to a replica whose informer cache has not yet observed a just-committed RD and return a spurious 404 (surfaced by linstor-csi as `ControllerPublishVolume failed: 404`). The RD GET now falls back to the uncached API reader on a cache NotFound — mirroring the existing volume-definition cache-lag handling — so a committed-but-not-yet-cached RD is resolved instead of 404'd. Pinned at L1 (`resource_definitions_rd404_internal_test`, which fails on the pre-fix path).

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For consistency with other bullet points (such as the one on line 13 starting with Satellite), the first word of this bullet point should be capitalized. Additionally, "resource definition" is used as a noun phrase here and should not be hyphenated. Suggested change: - Apiserver resolves a cache-missed resource definition via the direct API reader (#170) — the apiserver runs multiple replicas with no leader election, so a GET /v1/resource-definitions/{rd} can load-balance to a replica whose informer cache has not yet observed a just-committed RD and return a spurious 404 (surfaced by linstor-csi as ControllerPublishVolume failed: 404). The RD GET now falls back to the uncached API reader on a cache NotFound — mirroring the existing volume-definition cache-lag handling — so a committed-but-not-yet-cached RD is resolved instead of 404'd. Pinned at L1 (resource_definitions_rd404_internal_test, which fails on the pre-fix path).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant