Implementation of "Users in enterprise environments require the ability to add custom URI schemes and override standard URI schemes"#567
Open
k-channon-PA wants to merge 4 commits intocpm-cmake:masterfrom
Conversation
…some logic; Make updated cpm_parse_add_package_single_arg have behaviour more consistent with the pre-user-definable-uri-schemes version (cpm-cmake#564)
Member
|
Hi, just wondering if there was any feedback on this? |
|
Master has moved on, so I will try and find time to rebase onto the latest. Is anyone able to take a look at this PR? |
Member
|
@iboB final attempt at a ping, I'd really like your feedback on this feature. Do you still have time to support CPM.cmake? |
|
I didn't rebase in the end. I will try to do it soon. I really like the concept of CPM.cmake and hope it can continue to be supported :( |
This was referenced May 1, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an implementation of issue #564
I made the issue but received no feedback on the idea or the approach. Feedback welcome on this PR :)