feat: add support for compilation databases in clang-tidy #201

Performance Regression: -16.4%

❌ 14 regressed benchmarks
✅ 49 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 13 skipped benchmarks¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Efficiency
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_valid[args3-1]`	885.1 µs	1,051.1 µs	-15.79%
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_valid[args2-1]`	1.1 ms	1.2 ms	-13.38%
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_valid[args4-1]`	1.1 ms	1.2 ms	-14.01%
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_valid[args5-1]`	890.7 µs	1,048.7 µs	-15.07%
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_valid[args1-1]`	1.1 ms	1.2 ms	-13.66%
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_valid[args6-1]`	892.6 µs	1,057.3 µs	-15.58%
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_invalid[args2-1]`	995.6 µs	1,164.2 µs	-14.48%
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_invalid[args1-1]`	998.6 µs	1,167.4 µs	-14.46%
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_invalid[args0-1]`	876.7 µs	1,040.3 µs	-15.72%
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_invalid[args4-1]`	1 ms	1.2 ms	-14.05%
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_invalid[args6-1]`	847.9 µs	1,012.2 µs	-16.23%
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_invalid[args3-1]`	842.7 µs	1,008 µs	-16.4%
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_valid[args0-1]`	872.7 µs	1,040.1 µs	-16.1%
❌	`test_run_clang_tidy_invalid[args5-1]`	837.8 µs	1,001.8 µs	-16.37%

_{Comparing fix-197 (f018506) with main (451e2e0)²}

13 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
No successful run was found on main (b29757a) during the generation of this report, so 451e2e0 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩