Skip to content

chore: fix MinGW builds#27

Merged
ashtum merged 1 commit into
cppalliance:developfrom
ashtum:fix-mingw-builds
Dec 1, 2025
Merged

chore: fix MinGW builds#27
ashtum merged 1 commit into
cppalliance:developfrom
ashtum:fix-mingw-builds

Conversation

@ashtum
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@ashtum ashtum commented Dec 1, 2025

No description provided.

@cppalliance-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

cppalliance-bot commented Dec 1, 2025

An automated preview of the documentation is available at https://27.capy.prtest3.cppalliance.org/index.html

If more commits are pushed to the pull request, the docs will rebuild at the same URL.

2025-12-01 13:41:45 UTC

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 51.52%. Comparing base (5d2b750) to head (af49d43).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop      #27   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    51.52%   51.52%           
========================================
  Files           14       14           
  Lines          493      493           
========================================
  Hits           254      254           
  Misses         239      239           
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
include/boost/capy/polystore.hpp 85.39% <100.00%> (+0.16%) ⬆️
src/polystore.cpp 60.37% <ø> (-0.74%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5d2b750...af49d43. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ashtum ashtum merged commit 00f2592 into cppalliance:develop Dec 1, 2025
61 of 62 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants