You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This means v1.15–v1.17 require Standard SKU (/month each = /month) to deploy. As new versions are released, every new archived version will also require Standard, making this cost grow indefinitely.
Questions for maintainers
What was the benefit of upgrading Hugo/Docsy on archived version branches? These are read-only historical docs. Was there a rendering bug, security issue, or feature that required the upgrade?
Is the benefit worth the ongoing cost? Each archived version that exceeds 250MB requires a Standard SWA (~/month). Over time this compounds:
Today: 3 extra Standard SWAs = ~/month
After v1.19 release: 4 extra = ~/month
Pattern continues with each release
Should we revert the Docsy v2 upgrade on legacy branches? This would require reverting both the workflow files AND the theme/content changes from PRs Upgrade hugo docsy into 1.16 #4733 and Ensure minification of output #4793 on branches v1.15–v1.17. The original Hugo 0.100.2 + Docsy v1 output fits comfortably in the Free tier.
Alternative: Can we optimize Docsy v2 output size? If there's a way to reduce the Hugo 0.147.9 + Docsy v2 build output below 250MB (e.g., excluding unused assets, tree-shaking CSS/JS, or reducing generated page count), that would solve the problem without reverting.
Context
We are migrating SWAs to a new Azure subscription after the old one was deactivated
The SKU policy aims to keep only 3 SWAs on Standard (root, blog, newest preview) to control costs
v1.14 and older deploy successfully on Free tier using the original Hugo 0.100.2 workflow
Problem
PRs #4733 and #4793 upgraded Hugo and Docsy across multiple versioned branches (including v1.15, v1.16, v1.17). This upgrade:
Impact: Build output now exceeds Azure SWA Free tier 250MB limit
This means v1.15–v1.17 require Standard SKU (/month each = /month) to deploy. As new versions are released, every new archived version will also require Standard, making this cost grow indefinitely.
Questions for maintainers
What was the benefit of upgrading Hugo/Docsy on archived version branches? These are read-only historical docs. Was there a rendering bug, security issue, or feature that required the upgrade?
Is the benefit worth the ongoing cost? Each archived version that exceeds 250MB requires a Standard SWA (~/month). Over time this compounds:
Should we revert the Docsy v2 upgrade on legacy branches? This would require reverting both the workflow files AND the theme/content changes from PRs Upgrade hugo docsy into 1.16 #4733 and Ensure minification of output #4793 on branches v1.15–v1.17. The original Hugo 0.100.2 + Docsy v1 output fits comfortably in the Free tier.
Alternative: Can we optimize Docsy v2 output size? If there's a way to reduce the Hugo 0.147.9 + Docsy v2 build output below 250MB (e.g., excluding unused assets, tree-shaking CSS/JS, or reducing generated page count), that would solve the problem without reverting.
Context