Skip to content

Feature: Workflow history propagation#1802

Open
WhitWaldo wants to merge 11 commits intomasterfrom
workflow-history-propagation
Open

Feature: Workflow history propagation#1802
WhitWaldo wants to merge 11 commits intomasterfrom
workflow-history-propagation

Conversation

@WhitWaldo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Added support for workflow history propagation + unit/integration tests (>80% test coverage)

Issue reference

We strive to have all PR being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.

Please reference the issue this PR will close: #1801

Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list:

  • Code compiles correctly
  • Created/updated tests
  • Extended the documentation

WhitWaldo added 3 commits May 2, 2026 18:08
Signed-off-by: Whit Waldo <whit.waldo@innovian.net>
Signed-off-by: Whit Waldo <whit.waldo@innovian.net>
Signed-off-by: Whit Waldo <whit.waldo@innovian.net>
@WhitWaldo WhitWaldo added this to the v1.18 milestone May 2, 2026
@WhitWaldo WhitWaldo self-assigned this May 2, 2026
@WhitWaldo WhitWaldo requested review from a team as code owners May 2, 2026 23:11
@WhitWaldo WhitWaldo added kind/enhancement New feature or request area/workflow labels May 2, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 2, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 65.42%. Comparing base (d6a25ab) to head (cd9b42d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1802   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   65.42%   65.42%           
=======================================
  Files         296      296           
  Lines        8694     8694           
  Branches     1009     1009           
=======================================
  Hits         5688     5688           
  Misses       2761     2761           
  Partials      245      245           
Flag Coverage Δ
net10.0 65.41% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@WhitWaldo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This is blocked until a 1.18 RC is available from the runtime.

@WhitWaldo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@copilot Can you please fix this merge conflict?

Co-authored-by: WhitWaldo <2238529+WhitWaldo@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI commented May 9, 2026

@copilot Can you please fix this merge conflict?

Fixed in commit 14b45c5 by merging latest origin/master into this branch, resolving the conflict in WorkflowOrchestrationContext, and updating the history propagation test to align with the upstream serializer migration.

@WhitWaldo WhitWaldo added kind/enhancement-runtime-dependency New feature or request due to a runtime feature and removed kind/enhancement New feature or request Blocked - Need Runtime RC labels May 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/workflow kind/enhancement-runtime-dependency New feature or request due to a runtime feature

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for workflow history propagation

2 participants