feat: implement Dapr.StateManagement package — AOT-safe, reflection-free

[Copilot]

Description

Ensures the Dapr.StateManagement implementation (and shared infrastructure in Dapr.Common) does not use reflection and is fully Native AOT-safe.

Changes Made

AOT / Reflection Elimination

• IDaprSerializer — Added a new Serialize<T>(T value) generic overload. The non-generic Serialize(object?, Type?) and Deserialize(string?, Type) overloads (which accept a runtime Type) are now annotated with [RequiresUnreferencedCode] and [RequiresDynamicCode] to make their AOT-unsafety explicit.
• JsonDaprSerializer — Implements the new Serialize<T>(T) overload using JsonSerializer.Serialize<T>(value, options), which is fully AOT-safe. Matching annotations added to the non-generic overloads.
• DaprStateManagementGrpcClient.SerializeValue<TValue> — Changed from Serializer.Serialize(value, typeof(TValue)) (reflection path) to Serializer.Serialize<TValue>(value) (AOT-safe generic path).
• DaprClientBuilderExtensions.AddDaprClient<> — Replaced two Activator.CreateInstance calls with explicit Func<IConfiguration?, TClientBuilder> and Func<IServiceCollection, TServiceBuilder> factory delegate parameters. No reflection is used in the hot path.

Callers Updated

All 6 AddDaprClient<> callers updated to pass explicit factory lambdas (config => new TClientBuilder(config) / svc => new TServiceBuilder(svc)): Jobs, Cryptography, AI, DistributedLock, Messaging, and StateManagement.

Test Fixes (Build Failure)

• DaprClientBuilderExtensionsTests — Updated all 4 call sites to pass the two new required factory delegate parameters. Fixed DaprTestClientBuilder.Build() which was throwing NotImplementedException; it now correctly calls BuildDaprClientDependencies and returns a real DaprTestGrpcClient.
• Dapr.Workflow.Test stub serializers — Added the missing Serialize<T>(T) method to 6 stub/mock IDaprSerializer/IWorkflowSerializer implementations: StubSerializer, CapturingSerializer, StubDaprSerializer, StubWorkflowSerializer, DependencyBasedSerializer, and MockSerializer.

Issue reference

We strive to have all PR being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.

Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list:

• Code compiles correctly
• Created/updated tests
• Extended the documentation

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 30.54893% with 291 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 63.86%. Comparing base (85f94fa) to head (991278c).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...anagement.Runtime/DaprStateManagementGrpcClient.cs	10.96%	274 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...ateManagement.Abstractions/Models/BulkStateItem.cs	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...tateManagement.Abstractions/StateStoreAttribute.cs	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...rc/Dapr.Common/Serialization/JsonDaprSerializer.cs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...nagement.Abstractions/DaprStateManagementClient.cs	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️
.../DaprStateManagementServiceCollectionExtensions.cs	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1806      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   65.42%   63.86%   -1.57%     
==========================================
  Files         296      308      +12     
  Lines        8694     9093     +399     
  Branches     1009     1065      +56     
==========================================
+ Hits         5688     5807     +119     
- Misses       2761     3040     +279     
- Partials      245      246       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
net10.0	63.85% <30.54%> (-1.57%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[WhitWaldo]

@copilot This project is failing to build. Can you give it another pass?

[Copilot]

@copilot This project is failing to build. Can you give it another pass?

Fixed in 9ab98d1. Two root causes:

1. DaprClientBuilderExtensionsTests — The 4 test call sites still used the old AddDaprClient<> signature (no factory delegates). Updated all 4 to pass config => new DaprTestClientBuilder(config) and svc => new DaprTestBuilder(svc). Also fixed DaprTestClientBuilder.Build() which was throwing NotImplementedException — it now calls BuildDaprClientDependencies and returns a real DaprTestGrpcClient.

2. Dapr.Workflow.Test stub serializers — Adding Serialize<T>(T) to IDaprSerializer broke 6 stub/mock implementations (StubSerializer, CapturingSerializer, StubDaprSerializer, StubWorkflowSerializer, DependencyBasedSerializer, MockSerializer). Added the missing method to each.

Full solution now builds cleanly; 74 Dapr.Common.Test + 367 Dapr.Workflow.Test pass.