Skip to content

Watermark: add note about effect of framing on position#842

Open
deekayhd wants to merge 1 commit intodarktable-org:masterfrom
deekayhd:framing_watermark_module_order
Open

Watermark: add note about effect of framing on position#842
deekayhd wants to merge 1 commit intodarktable-org:masterfrom
deekayhd:framing_watermark_module_order

Conversation

@deekayhd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This is a proposal for issue #724.

I added a note to the documentation of the watermark module that the framing module affects the positioning of the watermark and that this can be solved by changing the default order of the modules manually.

closes #724


---

**Note**: When using the watermark in combination with the framing module, keep in mind that the added frame affects the watermark’s position. For example, if you align the watermark to an edge, it may appear within the frame instead of on the actual image. To ensure the watermark is positioned relative to the image itself, you can manually adjust the module order so that the framing module comes after the watermark module in the pixelpipe.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good. I have a couple of suggestions for you to consider:

  1. maybe replace keep in mind that the added frame with the added frame, as I guess that will be easier for translations.
  2. adjusting the module order is maybe not that common, so maybe link to it with something like
manually [adjust the module order](../../../darkroom/pixelpipe/the-pixelpipe-and-module-order.md) so

@Phemisters Phemisters self-assigned this May 9, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Expand documentation on using a watermark and framing

2 participants