Skip to content

features vs fields #304

@wilko77

Description

@wilko77

Currently we have a mixed terminology to refer to features / fields.
The schema uses features, whereas the field_formats.py file mostly uses fields.
It would be nice to unify this.

There is a lot of different terminology out there, depending on you allegiance.

CSV: talks about records which are divided by fields.
Relational algebra: Terms like Domain, Table, Attribute, Key and Tuple are used
SQL: row and column
DBs: tuple or record and attribute or field
ML: examples and features

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions