Updated release workflow#1060
Conversation
| @@ -1,37 +0,0 @@ | |||
| name: Release (TestPyPI) | |||
|
|
|||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@mgyucht Is this workflow still relevant/required?
|
If integration tests don't run automatically, an authorized user can run them manually by following the instructions below: Trigger: Inputs:
Checks will be approved automatically on success. |
mgyucht
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This LGTM.
We should keep the TestPyPI workflow if we can. It is useful in case we need to modify the release workflow; otherwise, there is no way to test changes to it. We struggle for this reason with testing the Java release; the only way to test is by actually making a release, and hopefully it is the version you like. (We can kind of work around this by not automatically "deploying" Java releases during tests, but you are still testing in a production environment.)
What changes are proposed in this pull request?
Updated the Release workflow.
Deleted some unused workflows:
How is this tested?
N/A
NO_CHANGELOG=true