Skip to content

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [MEDIUM] Prevent internal error leakage in OAuth callback#246

Open
davidruzicka wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
jules-auth-oauth-provider-status-500-error-fix-1982166344946449096
Open

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [MEDIUM] Prevent internal error leakage in OAuth callback#246
davidruzicka wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
jules-auth-oauth-provider-status-500-error-fix-1982166344946449096

Conversation

@davidruzicka
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [MEDIUM] Prevent internal error leakage in OAuth callback

πŸ’‘ Vulnerability: The handleCallback method in ExternalOAuthProvider was returning a raw string Internal Server Error during token exchange upon catch blocks, lacking a correlation ID and not strictly adhering to the standard 500 error format requested by Sentinel guidelines (which mandates logging a correlation ID and presenting a generic client message referencing it).
🎯 Impact: This missing structured logging makes debugging harder and diverges from the internal error leakage policy outlined in .jules/sentinel.md.
πŸ”§ Fix: Imported generateCorrelationId and used it to log the full error stack with the correlationId internally, and sent back a sanitized Internal error (correlation ID: <id>) string to the client. Updated the test mock expectation.
βœ… Verification: Ran npm run test and vitest run --config vitest.config.ts src/auth/oauth-provider.test.ts. Tests pass correctly.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 1982166344946449096 started by @davidruzicka

Updated `src/auth/oauth-provider.ts` to log a generated Correlation ID and return a generic client-facing message on failure, preventing raw error leakage while maintaining debuggability. Updated test correspondingly.

Co-authored-by: davidruzicka <14172985+davidruzicka@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@chatgpt-codex-connector
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 12, 2026

Codecov Report

βœ… All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
βœ… All tests successful. No failed tests found.

πŸ“’ Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant