Skip to content

Commit 83e83e5

Browse files
enriquepabonTu Nombreclaude
authored
Add deep-research-notebooklm skill (#444)
Adds a structured deep research skill powered by NotebookLM MCP server. Features: 9-step research workflow, 6 research types, studio artifact generation (slides, audio, video, infographics, reports, mind maps), and a reusable research brief template. Requires: NotebookLM MCP server (nlm setup add claude-code) Co-authored-by: Tu Nombre <tuemail@example.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
1 parent e460c6c commit 83e83e5

2 files changed

Lines changed: 189 additions & 0 deletions

File tree

Lines changed: 132 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
1+
---
2+
name: deep-research-notebooklm
3+
description: "Deep research skill powered by NotebookLM MCP. Conducts structured multi-source research (market analysis, competitive intel, trend analysis, prospect research) using Google NotebookLM as the research engine, then delivers formatted briefs and optional studio artifacts (slides, audio podcasts, videos, infographics, reports, mind maps)."
4+
---
5+
6+
# Deep Research via NotebookLM
7+
8+
Research **$ARGUMENTS** deeply using the NotebookLM MCP server and deliver a structured research brief. Optionally generate studio artifacts (slides, audio podcasts, videos, infographics, reports, mind maps) from the research.
9+
10+
## Prerequisites
11+
12+
- **NotebookLM MCP server** must be configured. Install via: `nlm setup add claude-code`
13+
- If NotebookLM MCP tools are not available, tell the user to run the setup command and restart their session.
14+
15+
## Research Workflow
16+
17+
### Step 1: Define Scope
18+
19+
Determine the **research type** based on the user's request:
20+
21+
| Type | Focus |
22+
|------|-------|
23+
| **Market Research** | Industry trends, market sizing, opportunities, TAM/SAM/SOM |
24+
| **Competitive Intel** | Competitor analysis, positioning gaps, feature comparisons |
25+
| **Client/Prospect Research** | Company background, pain points, decision makers, recent news |
26+
| **Trend Analysis** | Technology trends, adoption patterns, forecasts, emerging players |
27+
| **Proposal Research** | Background for proposals, sector-specific data, case studies |
28+
| **Academic/Technical** | Papers, frameworks, methodologies, state of the art |
29+
30+
Tell the user what you plan to research and confirm the angle:
31+
32+
> "I'll research [topic]. My angle: [specific focus]. I'll investigate: [2-3 specific questions]. Sound right, or should I adjust?"
33+
34+
Wait for confirmation before proceeding.
35+
36+
### Step 2: Create NotebookLM Notebook
37+
38+
Use `notebook_create` to create a notebook named:
39+
`Research: [Topic] - [YYYY-MM-DD]`
40+
41+
### Step 3: Add Context Sources
42+
43+
Use `source_add` to seed the notebook with relevant context:
44+
- Add any URLs the user provides (articles, company pages, reports)
45+
- Add any documents or files the user references
46+
- Add text summaries of relevant background if no URLs are available
47+
- If researching a company, add their website, LinkedIn, recent press
48+
49+
### Step 4: Run Research
50+
51+
Use `research_start` with a well-crafted query based on the topic and context.
52+
53+
**Mode selection:**
54+
- Default: `"fast"` (~60 seconds, ~10 sources) -- good for most queries
55+
- Use `"deep"` only if the user explicitly asks for exhaustive research (can take 10+ minutes and may stall at 0 sources)
56+
57+
**Tip:** Run direct `WebSearch` calls in parallel with NotebookLM for faster initial data gathering while the research engine works.
58+
59+
Poll `research_status` until complete. Use the `query` parameter as fallback matching -- task IDs can change between `research_start` and `research_status` calls.
60+
61+
### Step 5: Import Discovered Sources
62+
63+
Use `research_import` to bring discovered sources into the notebook for deeper analysis.
64+
65+
### Step 6: Query for Insights
66+
67+
Use `notebook_query` to ask 3-5 targeted questions based on the research type:
68+
69+
1. **Overview**: "What are the key findings about [topic]?"
70+
2. **Opportunities**: "What opportunities or gaps exist in this space?"
71+
3. **Actions**: "What are the most actionable insights from this research?"
72+
4. **Risks**: "What are the main risks, challenges, or counterarguments?"
73+
5. **Custom**: A question specific to the research type (e.g., "Who are the top 5 competitors and how do they differentiate?" for competitive intel)
74+
75+
### Step 7: Write Research Brief
76+
77+
Save the findings to a local file using the research brief template:
78+
79+
**File path:** `research/[topic-slug]-[YYYY-MM-DD].md`
80+
81+
Use the template from [research-brief-template.md](research-brief-template.md) to structure the output. Create the `research/` directory if it does not exist.
82+
83+
### Step 8: Present Takeaways
84+
85+
After saving, present the user with:
86+
- **3-5 headline findings** (bullets, direct, no filler)
87+
- **1-2 recommended actions** connected to the user's stated goals
88+
- **Surprises or contrarian findings** -- anything that challenges assumptions
89+
- **The file path** where the full brief is saved
90+
- **The NotebookLM notebook URL** so the user can explore sources directly
91+
92+
### Step 9 (Optional): Generate Studio Artifacts
93+
94+
Ask the user: "Want me to generate any artifacts from this research? Options: slides, audio (podcast), video, infographic, report, mind map."
95+
96+
If yes, use `studio_create` with the notebook_id from Step 2.
97+
98+
**Available artifact types and recommended settings:**
99+
100+
| Type | Key params | Best for |
101+
|------|-----------|----------|
102+
| `slide_deck` | `slide_format`: `detailed_deck` or `presenter_slides`; `slide_length`: `short` or `default` | Executive presentations, client pitches |
103+
| `audio` | `audio_format`: `deep_dive`, `brief`, `critique`, or `debate`; `audio_length`: `short`, `default`, `long` | Podcast-style deep dives, learning on the go |
104+
| `video` | `video_format`: `explainer`, `brief`, `cinematic`; `visual_style`: `auto_select`, `classic`, `whiteboard`, etc. | Visual explainers, social media content |
105+
| `infographic` | `orientation`: `landscape`, `portrait`, `square`; `infographic_style`: `professional`, `bento_grid`, etc. | One-pagers, social sharing |
106+
| `report` | `report_format`: `Briefing Doc`, `Study Guide`, `Blog Post`, `Create Your Own` | Written deliverables, summaries |
107+
| `mind_map` | `title` | Visual knowledge mapping |
108+
109+
**Common params for all artifact types:**
110+
- `language`: Set to the user's preferred language (e.g., `"en"`, `"es"`, `"pt"`)
111+
- `focus_prompt`: A clear directive about what to emphasize in the artifact
112+
- `confirm`: Must be `true` to proceed with generation
113+
114+
**After creating an artifact:**
115+
1. Poll `studio_status` until `completed` (audio/video: 5-15 min; slides/infographics: 2-5 min)
116+
2. Use `download_artifact` to save locally if needed
117+
3. Provide the notebook URL so the user can access artifacts directly
118+
119+
**Tips:**
120+
- `audio` with `deep_dive` format produces the best podcast-style analysis
121+
- `slide_deck` with `detailed_deck` format works best for standalone reading; `presenter_slides` is better when accompanied by speaker notes
122+
- Audio status may show `"unknown"` once completed -- check for `audio_url` presence instead of waiting for a `"completed"` status
123+
124+
## Notes
125+
126+
- Fast mode is recommended as the default. Deep mode is powerful but can take 10+ minutes and occasionally stalls.
127+
- Always confirm the research scope with the user before starting -- a well-scoped query produces dramatically better results.
128+
- The research brief template ensures consistent, actionable output across all research types.
129+
130+
## Additional Resources
131+
132+
- [research-brief-template.md](research-brief-template.md) -- Template for structuring research brief output
Lines changed: 57 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
1+
# Research Brief: [Topic]
2+
3+
**Date:** [YYYY-MM-DD]
4+
**Type:** [Market Research | Competitive Intel | Client Research | Trend Analysis | Proposal Research | Academic/Technical]
5+
**NotebookLM Notebook:** [notebook name and URL]
6+
7+
---
8+
9+
## Executive Summary
10+
11+
[2-3 sentences: what was researched, why it matters, top-line finding]
12+
13+
---
14+
15+
## Key Findings
16+
17+
### 1. [Finding Title]
18+
[Detail with data points, statistics, or evidence where available]
19+
20+
### 2. [Finding Title]
21+
[Detail with supporting evidence]
22+
23+
### 3. [Finding Title]
24+
[Detail with supporting evidence]
25+
26+
---
27+
28+
## Opportunities
29+
30+
- [Specific opportunity with context on why it matters]
31+
- [Specific opportunity with potential impact]
32+
33+
---
34+
35+
## Risks & Challenges
36+
37+
- [Risk or challenge with context and severity assessment]
38+
- [Risk or challenge with mitigation considerations]
39+
40+
---
41+
42+
## Recommended Actions
43+
44+
1. **[Action]** -- [Why this matters and suggested next step]
45+
2. **[Action]** -- [Why this matters and suggested next step]
46+
47+
---
48+
49+
## Sources
50+
51+
- [Source 1 -- title, URL, and relevance]
52+
- [Source 2 -- title, URL, and relevance]
53+
- [Source 3 -- title, URL, and relevance]
54+
55+
---
56+
57+
*Generated via deep-research-notebooklm skill using NotebookLM MCP*

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)