Skip to content

improve: enhance security-auditor agent#427

Closed
davila7 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
review/security-auditor-2026-03-18
Closed

improve: enhance security-auditor agent#427
davila7 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
review/security-auditor-2026-03-18

Conversation

@davila7
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@davila7 davila7 commented Mar 18, 2026

Automated Component Improvement

Changes

  • Removed fictional communication protocol blocks: Eliminated the JSON Communication Protocol and Progress tracking sections that referenced a non-existent "context manager". Replaced startup instructions with real tool-use instructions.
  • Added 5-phase audit methodology: Scoping (Glob + Read manifests), Automated Pattern Scanning (Grep), Control Review (Read configs), Finding Classification (CWE table), and Reporting (structured output template).
  • Added concrete Grep patterns: Actionable regex patterns for secrets/credential exposure, cryptography weaknesses, command/SQL injection, hardcoded internal addresses, container security issues, and CI/CD pipeline risks.
  • Updated compliance frameworks: PCI DSS v4.0 (March 2024), ISO 27001:2022, NIST CSF 2.0 (Feb 2024 with Govern function), NIST SP 800-218 SSDF, OWASP Top 10 2021, OWASP API Security Top 10 2023, OWASP Kubernetes Top 10 2022, SLSA.
  • Added four new audit domains: Supply Chain Security (SBOM, Dependabot), Container and Kubernetes Security (Dockerfile, RBAC), CI/CD Pipeline Security (action pinning, SAST), Secrets Management (rotation, vault integration).
  • Replaced hardcoded example numbers: Removed the fictional "347 controls, 52 findings, 87% compliance" delivery notification with placeholder template using [N] variables.
  • Added CWE-referenced finding classification table: Critical/High/Medium/Low with CWE references (CWE-798, CWE-89, CWE-287, etc.).
  • Converted noun-phrase checklists to verb-driven content: Each section now instructs the agent what to do rather than listing topics.

Research Summary

The original component had structural problems that made it non-functional: it referenced a context manager API that does not exist, used JSON blocks to simulate inter-agent communication (which agents cannot actually do), and contained hardcoded fictional metrics. The body was organized as flat noun-phrase checklists with no executable guidance. Compliance frameworks referenced outdated versions. The component also lacked modern security domains (supply chain, containers, CI/CD, secrets management) that are now standard in security audits.

Validation

  • component-reviewer: PASSED
    • Valid YAML frontmatter with all required fields
    • kebab-case name matches filename
    • No hardcoded secrets (grep patterns in body are documented examples)
    • No absolute paths
    • Correct category placement: agents/security/
    • Tools (Read, Grep, Glob) match actual tool usage in methodology
    • Clear, specific, actionable system prompt

Automated review cycle by Component Improvement Loop


Summary by cubic

Reworked the security-auditor component to be actionable and aligned with real tool usage, replacing fictional protocols with a structured, modern audit workflow. This improves accuracy, updates frameworks, and adds concrete scanning patterns and domains.

  • New Features
    • Replaced fake JSON “communication protocol” with real instructions using Glob, Read, and Grep; removed hardcoded metrics.
    • Added a 5-phase audit flow (Scoping, Pattern Scanning, Control Review, Classification, Reporting) with regex checks for secrets, crypto weaknesses, injection, container, and CI/CD risks.
    • Updated frameworks to current versions (PCI DSS v4.0, ISO 27001:2022, NIST CSF 2.0, OWASP API Security 2023, SLSA) and introduced a CWE-based severity model.
    • Expanded coverage with new domains: Supply Chain Security, Containers/Kubernetes, CI/CD Security, and Secrets Management.
    • Area: components (cli-tool/components/). No new components; no docs/components.json regeneration needed. No new environment variables or secrets.

Written for commit 1098924. Summary will update on new commits.

- Replace fictional JSON communication protocol blocks with real tool-use instructions (Glob, Read, Grep)
- Add 5-phase audit methodology: Scoping, Pattern Scanning, Control Review, Finding Classification, Reporting
- Add concrete Grep regex patterns for secrets, crypto weaknesses, injection, container, and CI/CD risks
- Update compliance frameworks to current versions: PCI DSS v4.0, ISO 27001:2022, NIST CSF 2.0, OWASP API Security Top 10 2023, SLSA
- Add four new audit domains: Supply Chain Security, Container and Kubernetes Security, CI/CD Pipeline Security, Secrets Management
- Replace hardcoded example numbers (347 controls, 52 findings, 87%) with template placeholders
- Add CWE-referenced finding classification table (Critical/High/Medium/Low)
- Convert noun-phrase checklists to verb-driven instructional content

Automated review cycle | Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel Bot commented Mar 18, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
claude-code-templates Ready Ready Preview Mar 18, 2026 5:06pm

Request Review

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️ Security Audit Report

Status: ❌ FAILED

Metric Count
Total Components 753
✅ Passed 360
❌ Failed 393
⚠️ Warnings 620

❌ Failed Components (Top 5)

Component Errors Warnings Score
vercel-edge-function 3 4 81/100
neon-expert 2 1 89/100
agent-overview 2 1 89/100
unused-code-cleaner 2 1 89/100
context7 2 2 88/100

...and 388 more failed component(s)


📊 View Full Report for detailed error messages and all components

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

3 issues found across 1 file

Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)

Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.


<file name="cli-tool/components/agents/security/security-auditor.md">

<violation number="1" location="cli-tool/components/agents/security/security-auditor.md:20">
P2: Don't ask the agent to identify known vulnerable packages from manifest reads alone. With only Read/Grep/Glob, it can inventory dependencies but cannot verify advisories.</violation>

<violation number="2" location="cli-tool/components/agents/security/security-auditor.md:147">
P2: This task is not executable with the declared tools. Secret detection in git history requires VCS/history access, not just Read/Grep/Glob over the current tree.</violation>

<violation number="3" location="cli-tool/components/agents/security/security-auditor.md:160">
P2: Update the PCI DSS row to the active version. Listing v4.0 as current will benchmark audits against a retired standard.</violation>
</file>

Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix. Tag @cubic-dev-ai to re-run a review.

- Secrets rotation policies and enforcement
- Vault or secrets manager integration vs. environment variable sprawl
- `.gitignore` and pre-commit hook coverage for secrets
- Detection of secrets in git history
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot Mar 18, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2: This task is not executable with the declared tools. Secret detection in git history requires VCS/history access, not just Read/Grep/Glob over the current tree.

Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At cli-tool/components/agents/security/security-auditor.md, line 147:

<comment>This task is not executable with the declared tools. Secret detection in git history requires VCS/history access, not just Read/Grep/Glob over the current tree.</comment>

<file context>
@@ -1,287 +1,180 @@
+- Secrets rotation policies and enforcement
+- Vault or secrets manager integration vs. environment variable sprawl
+- `.gitignore` and pre-commit hook coverage for secrets
+- Detection of secrets in git history
+
+### Incident Response
</file context>
Suggested change
- Detection of secrets in git history
- Detection of secrets in the current repository contents, and explicit note when git-history scanning requires separate VCS access
Fix with Cubic

| Framework | Current Version | Key Focus |
|-----------|----------------|-----------|
| SOC 2 Type II | 2017 (TSC) | Trust service criteria |
| PCI DSS | v4.0 (March 2024) | Payment card data protection |
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot Mar 18, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2: Update the PCI DSS row to the active version. Listing v4.0 as current will benchmark audits against a retired standard.

Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At cli-tool/components/agents/security/security-auditor.md, line 160:

<comment>Update the PCI DSS row to the active version. Listing v4.0 as current will benchmark audits against a retired standard.</comment>

<file context>
@@ -1,287 +1,180 @@
+| Framework | Current Version | Key Focus |
+|-----------|----------------|-----------|
+| SOC 2 Type II | 2017 (TSC) | Trust service criteria |
+| PCI DSS | v4.0 (March 2024) | Payment card data protection |
+| ISO 27001 / 27002 | 2022 | ISMS controls |
+| HIPAA | Current | Healthcare data privacy |
</file context>
Suggested change
| PCI DSS | v4.0 (March 2024) | Payment card data protection |
| PCI DSS | v4.0.1 (June 2024) | Payment card data protection |
Fix with Cubic


1. Ask the user to clarify: audit goals, compliance targets, systems in scope, and timeline constraints.
2. Use Glob to map the repository structure: identify languages, frameworks, infrastructure-as-code, CI/CD configs, and Dockerfiles.
3. Use Read to examine package manifests (`package.json`, `requirements.txt`, `go.mod`, `Gemfile`, `pom.xml`) and identify dependencies and known vulnerable packages.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot Mar 18, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2: Don't ask the agent to identify known vulnerable packages from manifest reads alone. With only Read/Grep/Glob, it can inventory dependencies but cannot verify advisories.

Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At cli-tool/components/agents/security/security-auditor.md, line 20:

<comment>Don't ask the agent to identify known vulnerable packages from manifest reads alone. With only Read/Grep/Glob, it can inventory dependencies but cannot verify advisories.</comment>

<file context>
@@ -1,287 +1,180 @@
+
+1. Ask the user to clarify: audit goals, compliance targets, systems in scope, and timeline constraints.
+2. Use Glob to map the repository structure: identify languages, frameworks, infrastructure-as-code, CI/CD configs, and Dockerfiles.
+3. Use Read to examine package manifests (`package.json`, `requirements.txt`, `go.mod`, `Gemfile`, `pom.xml`) and identify dependencies and known vulnerable packages.
+4. Note what is explicitly out of scope to avoid scope creep.
+
</file context>
Suggested change
3. Use Read to examine package manifests (`package.json`, `requirements.txt`, `go.mod`, `Gemfile`, `pom.xml`) and identify dependencies and known vulnerable packages.
3. Use Read to examine package manifests (`package.json`, `requirements.txt`, `go.mod`, `Gemfile`, `pom.xml`) to inventory dependencies and flag packages that should be checked against an advisory source for known vulnerabilities.
Fix with Cubic

@davila7
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

davila7 commented Apr 19, 2026

Closing as superseded by later improvements to security-auditor.md (see PR #485, which itself is queued for review). This branch is 141 commits behind main. Branch deleted.

@davila7 davila7 closed this Apr 19, 2026
@davila7 davila7 deleted the review/security-auditor-2026-03-18 branch April 19, 2026 00:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant