chore(core): build glibc#1011
Merged
Merged
Conversation
danilrwx
force-pushed
the
chore/core/build-glibc
branch
4 times, most recently
from
881427b to
11ed960
Compare
Signed-off-by: Daniil Antoshin <daniil.antoshin@flant.com>
danilrwx
force-pushed
the
chore/core/build-glibc
branch
from
11ed960 to
2c22d15
Compare
danilrwx
requested review from
Isteb4k,
fl64,
nevermarine and
universal-itengineer
as code owners
Signed-off-by: Daniil Antoshin <daniil.antoshin@flant.com>
universal-itengineer
approved these changes
May 7, 2025
Merged
yachmenevas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2025
Signed-off-by: Daniil Antoshin <daniil.antoshin@flant.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Build glibc library.
Why do we need it, and what problem does it solve?
We want more control when building libraries files, as well as making images more secure
What is the expected result?
All work as expected
Checklist
Changelog entries