test(ci): rename ginkgo json report file#2305
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Nikita Korolev <nikita.korolev@flant.com>
hardcoretime
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2026
diafour
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fix E2E report handling in the reusable CI pipeline. The workflow now keeps the raw Ginkgo JSON report separate from the generated summary report and validates the loaded report before using it to build the final E2E status artifact.
Why do we need it, and what problem does it solve?
The pipeline started producing two JSON files for E2E runs: a summary object and a raw Ginkgo report array. Both matched the
e2e_summary_*.jsonpattern, so the failure-report step could pick the wrong file and then crash injqwhen it tried to read array data as a summary object.What is the expected result?
The reusable E2E workflow consistently picks the summary JSON for downstream processing, keeps the raw Ginkgo report available as an artifact under a separate name, and no longer fails in the reporting step when both files are present.
Changelog entries