Skip to content

docs: Update JAX backend documentation on training support#5482

Open
njzjz wants to merge 1 commit into
deepmodeling:masterfrom
njzjz:docs-jax-training
Open

docs: Update JAX backend documentation on training support#5482
njzjz wants to merge 1 commit into
deepmodeling:masterfrom
njzjz:docs-jax-training

Conversation

@njzjz
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented May 30, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated backend documentation by refining content clarity.

Review Change Stack

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <jinzhe.zeng@ustc.edu.cn>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented May 30, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 070eb158-32ce-40fb-8299-e5dc46d726a8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ccaa551 and b507784.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • doc/backend.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • doc/backend.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request removes a single sentence from backend documentation that stated the backend is actively developed and lacks training support. No other backend or format details are altered.

Changes

Documentation Update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Backend documentation edit
doc/backend.md
Sentence about missing training support is deleted from the backend documentation.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: updating JAX backend documentation regarding training support.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.


💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread doc/backend.md
@njzjz njzjz closed this May 30, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 30, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.34%. Comparing base (d67e75b) to head (b507784).
⚠️ Report is 19 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5482      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.46%   81.34%   -1.13%     
==========================================
  Files         830      868      +38     
  Lines       88414    96358    +7944     
  Branches     4232     4236       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits        72913    78383    +5470     
- Misses      14215    16675    +2460     
- Partials     1286     1300      +14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@njzjz njzjz reopened this May 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants