fix: prompts and schemas of GitHubIssueCommenterTool and GitHubIssueViewerTool now properly explain url parameter

[julian-risch]

Related Issues

• None. @bilgeyucel and I discovered this bug when an Agent failed to properly call the Tool and instead returned the message:

ChatMessage(_role=<ChatRole.TOOL: 'tool'>, _content=[ToolCallResult(result='Failed to invoke Tool `github_issue_commenter` with parameters {\'comment\': "Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention! We appreciate your detailed bug report and want to assure you that we\'re currently investigating the problem. We\'ll keep you updated on our progress. If you have any more information to share, please feel free to comment!"}. Error: GitHubIssueCommenter.run() missing 1 required positional argument: \'url\'', origin=ToolCall(tool_name='github_issue_commenter', arguments={'comment': "Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention! We appreciate your detailed bug report and want to assure you that we're currently investigating the problem. We'll keep you updated on our progress. If you have any more information to share, please feel free to comment!"}, id='call_JLVltg9JWtlbfmHTrvO9lyXs'), error=True)]

Proposed Changes:

• Use url instead of issue_url in ISSUE_VIEWER_PROMPT and ISSUE_VIEWER_SCHEMA
• Explain url param in ISSUE_COMMENTER_SCHEMA and ISSUE_COMMENTER_PROMPT

How did you test it?

locally as part of testing the usage examples that I drafted for documentation pages

Notes for the reviewer

Checklist

• I have read the contributors guidelines and the code of conduct
• I have updated the related issue with new insights and changes
• I added unit tests and updated the docstrings
• I've used one of the conventional commit types for my PR title: fix:, feat:, build:, chore:, ci:, docs:, style:, refactor:, perf:, test:.

[sjrl]

Looks good!