Skip to content

Fix/XSUP-69905/CP-HEC Updated the authentication method#44452

Closed
MosheEichler wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
fix/XSUP-69905/CheckPointHEC-fix-in-the-authentication-body
Closed

Fix/XSUP-69905/CP-HEC Updated the authentication method#44452
MosheEichler wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
fix/XSUP-69905/CheckPointHEC-fix-in-the-authentication-body

Conversation

@MosheEichler
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Status

  • In Progress
  • Ready
  • In Hold - (Reason for hold)

Related Issues

https://jira-dc.paloaltonetworks.com/browse/XSUP-69905

Description

Moved clientId from the header into the JSON body alongside accessKey

Swagger to the UserControl request
https://app.swaggerhub.com/apis-docs/Check-Point/infinity-portal-api/1.0.6#/User%20Control/post_auth_external

Screenshot

Screenshot 2026-05-28 at 14 44 54

Must have

  • Tests
  • Documentation

@MosheEichler MosheEichler requested a review from DeanArbel May 28, 2026 11:47
@MosheEichler MosheEichler self-assigned this May 28, 2026
@MosheEichler MosheEichler added release-notes-only Indicates that this pull request has ONLY release notes to review for documentation process ready-for-pipeline-running Whether the pr is ready for running the whole pipeline, including testing on SAAS machines ready-for-ai-review The PR is ready for reviewing the PR with the AI Reviewer. labels May 28, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Your contributed CheckPointHEC pack has been modified on files:

Packs/CheckPointHEC/ReleaseNotes/1_1_16.md
Packs/CheckPointHEC/Integrations/CheckPointHEC/CheckPointHEC_test.py
Packs/CheckPointHEC/Integrations/CheckPointHEC/CheckPointHEC.py
Packs/CheckPointHEC/pack_metadata.json
Please review the changes here

@content-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 AI-Powered Code Review Available

You can leverage AI-powered code review to assist with this PR!

Available Commands:

  • @marketplace-ai-reviewer start review - Initiate a full AI code review
  • @marketplace-ai-reviewer re-review - Incremental review for new commits

@marketplace-ai-reviewer marketplace-ai-reviewer removed the ready-for-ai-review The PR is ready for reviewing the PR with the AI Reviewer. label May 28, 2026
@marketplace-ai-reviewer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 Analysis started. Please wait for results...

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions Bot commented May 28, 2026

Coverage

Coverage Report
FileStmtsMissCoverMissing
Packs/CheckPointHEC/Integrations/CheckPointHEC
   CheckPointHEC.py8029987%215, 253, 261, 265, 267, 271, 273, 275, 277, 279, 281, 285, 289, 293, 295, 299, 301, 303, 305, 309, 311, 315, 322, 324, 497, 506, 598, 601, 604, 622–623, 625, 642, 661, 666, 681–682, 684, 694–695, 697, 699, 701–702, 704–706, 708–709, 719–720, 723, 799, 802, 821, 826, 899, 912, 922, 968, 974, 1365–1366, 1368–1371, 1378, 1437–1443, 1445, 1448–1450, 1457, 1474–1475, 1477–1480, 1487, 1546–1552, 1554, 1557–1559, 1566
TOTAL8029987% 

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
88 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 6.579s ⏱️

marketplace-ai-reviewer

This comment was marked as outdated.

@tcarmeli1 tcarmeli1 added the ready-for-ai-review The PR is ready for reviewing the PR with the AI Reviewer. label May 28, 2026
@content-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Validate summary
The following errors were thrown as a part of this pr: .
If the AG100 validation in the pre-commit GitHub Action fails, the pull request cannot be force-merged.

Verdict: PR can be force merged from validate perspective? ✅

@marketplace-ai-reviewer marketplace-ai-reviewer removed the ready-for-ai-review The PR is ready for reviewing the PR with the AI Reviewer. label May 28, 2026
@marketplace-ai-reviewer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 Analysis started. Please wait for results...

@marketplace-ai-reviewer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🤖 AI Review Disclaimer

This review was generated by an AI-powered tool and may contain inaccuracies. Please be advised, and we extend our sincere apologies for any inconvenience this may cause.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@marketplace-ai-reviewer marketplace-ai-reviewer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi there, thanks for your contribution! I've reviewed your PR and just have a minor formatting note. Please ensure the API name and error message in the release notes are bolded to align with our entity styling guidelines. Great work overall!

@marketplace-ai-reviewer, @DeanArbel, @MosheEichler please review and approve the results generated by the AI Reviewer by responding 👍 on this comment.


##### Check Point Harmony Email and Collaboration (HEC)

- Fixed an issue where the Check Point Infinity API authentication failed with "Client id not found".
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please apply the correct entity styling for the API name and the error message.

According to the Entity Styling guidelines, proper nouns and literal values surfaced to the user (such as error messages) should be formatted in bold.

Suggested change
- Fixed an issue where the Check Point Infinity API authentication failed with "Client id not found".
- Fixed an issue where the **Check Point Infinity API** authentication failed with **"Client id not found"**.

@content-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🔍 AI Triage Report Available

An automated triage report has been generated for this pipeline.

Status: success
Report ID: 9d53547e4d0980a8

📋 Triage Report

⚠️ AI-generated triage. Validate before acting.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-for-pipeline-running Whether the pr is ready for running the whole pipeline, including testing on SAAS machines release-notes-only Indicates that this pull request has ONLY release notes to review for documentation process

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants