Commit 0fd386c
fix: point patronymic_rules=True at the v1 migration path
v1's patronymic_name_order was a bool flag, so True is the likeliest
wrong value a migrator passes to the 2.0 field; it failed loudly but
with the raw "'bool' object is not iterable". Probe with iter() --
NOT a try/except around tuple()/frozenset(), which would also rewrite
exceptions raised inside a caller's generator (pinned property) -- and
raise a message naming the v1 flag and both working replacements.
Same guard on PolicyPatch's union fields, with the v1 hint only where
it applies.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>1 parent d4aaafa commit 0fd386c
2 files changed
Lines changed: 47 additions & 6 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
85 | 85 | | |
86 | 86 | | |
87 | 87 | | |
88 | | - | |
89 | | - | |
90 | | - | |
91 | | - | |
92 | | - | |
93 | | - | |
| 88 | + | |
| 89 | + | |
| 90 | + | |
| 91 | + | |
| 92 | + | |
| 93 | + | |
| 94 | + | |
| 95 | + | |
| 96 | + | |
| 97 | + | |
| 98 | + | |
| 99 | + | |
| 100 | + | |
| 101 | + | |
| 102 | + | |
| 103 | + | |
| 104 | + | |
| 105 | + | |
94 | 106 | | |
95 | 107 | | |
96 | 108 | | |
| |||
232 | 244 | | |
233 | 245 | | |
234 | 246 | | |
| 247 | + | |
| 248 | + | |
| 249 | + | |
| 250 | + | |
| 251 | + | |
| 252 | + | |
| 253 | + | |
| 254 | + | |
| 255 | + | |
| 256 | + | |
| 257 | + | |
| 258 | + | |
| 259 | + | |
| 260 | + | |
| 261 | + | |
235 | 262 | | |
236 | 263 | | |
237 | 264 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
76 | 76 | | |
77 | 77 | | |
78 | 78 | | |
| 79 | + | |
| 80 | + | |
| 81 | + | |
| 82 | + | |
| 83 | + | |
| 84 | + | |
| 85 | + | |
| 86 | + | |
| 87 | + | |
| 88 | + | |
| 89 | + | |
| 90 | + | |
| 91 | + | |
| 92 | + | |
79 | 93 | | |
80 | 94 | | |
81 | 95 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments