Commit 3c27dad
Correct two comments this pass got wrong itself
Both describe the branch's own mechanism, and both were checked
against origin/master afterwards rather than before.
The maiden clause said 씨 "stayed in maiden 박씨 on the unscoped
segments[0]". It did stay there, but not for that reason: before #312
the family-comma gate sat ABOVE the peel and the stage returned
without running it at all.
The comma-and-dot test comment said the 间隔号 gates the surname split
and the family comma "gates it too". Both stand over the split, but
the family comma returns first, so the dot's gate is never reached on
this input -- which is the only reason the test is a composition and
not two facts.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>1 parent 6c0c3bc commit 3c27dad
2 files changed
Lines changed: 10 additions & 9 deletions
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
349 | 349 | | |
350 | 350 | | |
351 | 351 | | |
352 | | - | |
353 | | - | |
| 352 | + | |
| 353 | + | |
| 354 | + | |
354 | 355 | | |
355 | 356 | | |
356 | 357 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
622 | 622 | | |
623 | 623 | | |
624 | 624 | | |
625 | | - | |
626 | | - | |
627 | | - | |
628 | | - | |
629 | | - | |
630 | | - | |
631 | | - | |
| 625 | + | |
| 626 | + | |
| 627 | + | |
| 628 | + | |
| 629 | + | |
| 630 | + | |
| 631 | + | |
632 | 632 | | |
633 | 633 | | |
634 | 634 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments