Parent issue: Part of #89
Problem
The design specifies that the Daydreamer should run opportunistically, throttled by current graph complexity, and perform LTP/LTD, neighbor recalculation, prototype recomputation, and cluster stability maintenance. It's unclear if the existing implementation fully matches the documented behavior or if it respects the Williams-bound budgets.
Goal
Audit the Daydreamer components and ensure they:
- Run without blocking foreground queries (throttling respects budgets)
- Apply LTP/LTD and pruning as described
- Recompute prototypes and neighbor graphs within budget constraints
- Keep hotpath salience and community quotas consistent
Acceptance Criteria
- A review document (or test checklist) exists showing where the implementation matches/mismatches the design.
- If gaps are found, they are captured as follow-up issues (linked from this issue).
- Existing consolidation tests (if any) are updated or new tests added to validate throttling/budgeting behavior.
Notes
This issue is primarily an audit task; follow-up implementation work should be separate issues.
Parent issue: Part of #89
Problem
The design specifies that the Daydreamer should run opportunistically, throttled by current graph complexity, and perform LTP/LTD, neighbor recalculation, prototype recomputation, and cluster stability maintenance. It's unclear if the existing implementation fully matches the documented behavior or if it respects the Williams-bound budgets.
Goal
Audit the Daydreamer components and ensure they:
Acceptance Criteria
Notes
This issue is primarily an audit task; follow-up implementation work should be separate issues.