-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 271
fix: address open issues (308, 311, 400, 403, 404, 423, 425, 432) #443
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
57d7b79
test(score): regression tests for constraint-only git-status queries
dmtrKovalenko 4d15908
test(pi-fff): regression tests for path='.' and bare directory path
dmtrKovalenko 7d138b1
test(pi-fff): regression tests for absolute path normalization
dmtrKovalenko d40d4c0
fix(mcp): stop surfacing regex-fallback warning alongside matches
dmtrKovalenko 7217657
fix(mcp): treat maxResults=0 consistently across tools
dmtrKovalenko cf1d6ba
fix(pi-fff): serialize ensureFinder via in-flight promise cache
dmtrKovalenko 5cc374b
fix(core): demote 'git status path not in index' to debug
dmtrKovalenko 9a28be6
fix(mcp): accept 'pattern' as an alias for 'query' on grep/find_files
dmtrKovalenko File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
does having a sparse checkout repo hinder performance? the intention of my issue is to mitigate the slowness, I imagine we don't need to care about files not present on disk whatsoever. having an else branch here means we still have to do 'something' about it, which is why i think it is slower.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
if git doesn't return those non checked out files, the code here wouldn't even run right? so i think the root cause is git somehow caring about files not checked out.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wait are you saying that this issue is not fixed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
correct, i think the root issue has to do with fff doing unnecessary work. when the repo is sparsely checked out, we are still attempting to update the git status of files that aren't checked out.