[auto-bump] [no-release-notes] dependency by macneale4

[coffeegoddd]

☕ An Automated Dependency Version Bump PR 👑

Initial Changes

The changes contained in this PR were produced by `go get`ing the dependency.

```bash
go get github.com/dolthub/[dependency]/go@[commit]
```

[github-actions]

	Main	PR
covering_index_scan_postgres	1912.40/s	1893.49/s	-1.0%
groupby_scan_postgres	131.54/s	133.97/s	+1.8%
index_join_postgres	661.96/s	657.96/s	-0.7%
index_join_scan_postgres	810.37/s	815.00/s	+0.5%
index_scan_postgres	25.23/s	25.06/s	-0.7%
oltp_delete_insert_postgres	791.38/s	784.13/s	-1.0%
oltp_insert	679.52/s	673.44/s	-0.9%
oltp_point_select	2938.30/s	2919.60/s	-0.7%
oltp_read_only	2953.14/s	2940.58/s	-0.5%
oltp_read_write	2341.69/s	2341.18/s	-0.1%
oltp_update_index	723.69/s	720.59/s	-0.5%
oltp_update_non_index	752.17/s	751.98/s	-0.1%
oltp_write_only	1747.35/s	1741.74/s	-0.4%
select_random_points	1871.15/s	1867.23/s	-0.3%
select_random_ranges	1083.66/s	1081.07/s	-0.3%
table_scan_postgres	23.75/s	23.68/s	-0.3%
types_delete_insert_postgres	748.08/s	759.27/s	+1.4%
types_table_scan_postgres	8.33/s	8.15/s	-2.2%

[itoqa]

Commit: bce9373: 5 test cases ran, 0 failed ❌, 5 passed ✅, 0 additional findings ⚠️.

Summary

This run exercised core database behavior across replication flow and startup, transaction durability and state convergence, schema-change safety checks, and role-based access control boundaries. Coverage included both expected success paths and defensive denial paths, and overall application behavior remained consistent and healthy.

Safe to merge — the exercised functionality showed expected behavior with no failing results, including critical data consistency and authorization guardrails. The current signal indicates low merge risk and no blocker-level regressions in the covered areas.

Tests run by Ito

Result	Severity	Type	Description
✅	—	Permissions	Granted-role CREATE/SELECT/INSERT operations succeeded, while denied-role CREATE/SELECT/INSERT operations returned permission errors, matching the authorization boundary expected for this workflow.
✅	—	Permissions	Manipulating search_path produced permission errors or table-not-found responses for the denied role, and protected table row count remained unchanged.
✅	—	Replication	A cold-start replication run successfully applied INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE changes after COMMIT, and the WAL checkpoint advanced while replica rows matched primary state.
✅	—	Schema	The ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN statement was correctly rejected with a dependency error, and follow-up queries confirmed both schema and dependent row data remained unchanged.
✅	—	Startup	With complete postgres_replication configuration, startup launched the replication worker and replayed WAL writes to the replica as expected.

Tip

Reply with @itoqa to send us feedback on this test run.

[github-actions]

	Main	PR
Total	42090	42090
Successful	18269	18269
Failures	23821	23821
Partial Successes1	5333	5333

	Main	PR
Successful	43.4046%	43.4046%
Failures	56.5954%	56.5954%

Footnotes

1. These are tests that we're marking as Successful, however they do not match the expected output in some way. This is due to small differences, such as different wording on the error messages, or the column names being incorrect while the data itself is correct. ↩

[github-actions]

This PR has been superseded by #2852