skip conditional selection separation when extractAllFieldsToTypesCompact is enabled#10777
Merged
eddeee888 merged 9 commits intoMay 9, 2026
Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 2d47844 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
eddeee888
approved these changes
May 9, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
When
extractAllFieldsToTypesCompactis enabled, conditional fragmentspreads (
@skip/@include) and conditional inline fragments should NOTbe separated into
selectionNodesByTypeNameConditional. They should bemerged into the base
selectionNodesByTypeNamelike regular (unconditional)selections.
Problem
The
extractAllFieldsToTypesCompactoption is designed to produceapollo-tooling-compatible type output, where all fields from an operation
(including those from conditional fragments) appear in a single flat type.
Apollo-tooling never differentiated conditional fields as optional.
However, commit introducing conditional selection separation (which makes
conditional fragment fields optional via intersection types) is incompatible
with
extractAllFieldsToTypesCompactbecause:Processing conditional selections separately causes the same type name
to be generated multiple times (once from the base selection, once from
each conditional fragment), resulting in duplicate
export typedeclarations — a syntax error.
Conditional fragment fields from nested fragment spreads don't propagate
transitively, causing missing fields in generated types.
The
_seenFieldNamesdeduplication inbuildParentFieldNamepreventsnaming conflicts but not duplicate type declarations.
Fix
When
extractAllFieldsToTypesCompactis enabled, skip the conditionalcheck in
flattenSelectionSetand treat all selections uniformly. Thisrestores the alpha-version behavior where conditional and unconditional
selections were processed together, producing a single merged type with
all fields.
This is semantically correct for
extractAllFieldsToTypesCompactbecause: