Finally ship the ReSharper/Rider plugin

[Perksey]

For the JetBrains OSS Power-Up @matkoch and @HurricanKai put together a prototype ReSharper/Rider plugin for Silk.NET which enabled a "open specification" hotkey in Rider and had a prototype of an overload quickfix.

The overload quickfix is very early days and I suppose at some point we should work on productizing that a bit more, but for now I think we should work on getting the "open specification" button out of the door.

---

The work, as far as I can tell, is:

• Merge latest main into feature/jetbrains-plugin (it is VERY behind)
• Remove commented out code pertaining to the "open specification"/"open documentation" functionality
• Temporarily remove the quickfix code, and perhaps add it back in another branch.
• Run the data generator as part of the regenerate bindings NUKE job
• Investigate the CI/CD situation (I'm more than happy to sort this being in the Plugin Writers Slack) as ideally we will want to automate pushing to the JetBrains Plugin Registry when we make a tag.
  • all maintainers have access to the Silk.NET username/password for the JetBrains Plugin Registry
• Open a pull request
• Review & merge into main
• Either release or if we've sorted out the CD situation, wait until the next monthly update where it should release itself when tagged :)
• Raise issues for adding quickfix functionality into the plugin

---

Up-for-grabs for anyone, though it's a bit of a larger issue so @HurricanKai @ThomasMiz if either of you want to pick this up feel free.

[Beyley]

Got this all done up to CI/CD, so if someone wants to tackle CI, please do so i dont have to learn how to Continuously Integrate

[Perksey]

@Beyley I think I got most of the way there, see https://github.com/dotnet/Silk.NET/blob/feature/jetbrains-plugin/build/nuke/Build.ReSharper.cs

We just need to run PushToJetbrains as part of our usual release pipeline. I'm going to double check the logic there actually works this weekend by pushing another preview.

[Perksey]

This is a must have for 3.0 I think, we could do with some code completion providers for the DSL types.