fix word converter issues

Use different reasonable placeholders.

Author: BillWagner

standard/classes.md

@@ -3491,7 +3491,7 @@ The body of a get accessor for a ref-valued property shall conform to the rules
 
 A set accessor corresponds to a method with a single value parameter of the property type and a `void` return type. The implicit parameter of a set accessor is always named `value`. When a property is referenced as the target of an assignment ([§12.23](expressions.md#1223-assignment-operators)), or as the operand of `++` or `–-` ([§12.8.16](expressions.md#12816-postfix-increment-and-decrement-operators), [§12.9.7](expressions.md#1297-prefix-increment-and-decrement-operators)), the set accessor is invoked with an argument that provides the new value ([§12.23.2](expressions.md#12232-simple-assignment)). The body of a set accessor shall conform to the rules for `void` methods described in [§15.6.11](classes.md#15611-method-body). In particular, return statements in the set accessor body are not permitted to specify an expression. Since a set accessor implicitly has a parameter named `value`, it is a compile-time error for a local variable or constant declaration in a set accessor to have that name.
 
-An init accessor corresponds to a method with a single value parameter of the property type and a `void` return type. The implicit parameter of an init accessor is always named `value`. Only during the construction phase of an object (§init-accessors), and if an init accessor exists, when a property is referenced as the target of an assignment ([§12.21](expressions.md#1221-assignment-operators)), or as the operand of `++` or `–-` ([§12.8.15](expressions.md#12815-postfix-increment-and-decrement-operators), [§12.9.6](expressions.md#1296-prefix-increment-and-decrement-operators)), the init accessor is invoked with an argument that provides the new value ([§12.21.2](expressions.md#12212-simple-assignment)). The body of an init accessor shall conform to the rules for `void` methods described in [§15.6.11](classes.md#15611-method-body). In particular, return statements in the init accessor body are not permitted to specify an expression. Since an init accessor implicitly has a parameter named `value`, it is a compile-time error for a local variable or constant declaration in an init accessor to have that name.
+An init accessor corresponds to a method with a single value parameter of the property type and a `void` return type. The implicit parameter of an init accessor is always named `value`. Only during the construction phase of an object (§init-accessors), and if an init accessor exists, when a property is referenced as the target of an assignment ([§12.21](expressions.md#1223-assignment-operators)), or as the operand of `++` or `–-` ([§12.8.16](expressions.md#12816-postfix-increment-and-decrement-operators), [§12.9.7](expressions.md#1297-prefix-increment-and-decrement-operators)), the init accessor is invoked with an argument that provides the new value ([§12.23.2](expressions.md#12232-simple-assignment)). The body of an init accessor shall conform to the rules for `void` methods described in [§15.6.11](classes.md#15611-method-body). In particular, return statements in the init accessor body are not permitted to specify an expression. Since an init accessor implicitly has a parameter named `value`, it is a compile-time error for a local variable or constant declaration in an init accessor to have that name.
 
 It is a compile-time error for a *property_declaration* containing an *init_accessor_declaration* to also have the *property_modifier* `static`.
 
@@ -3782,7 +3782,7 @@ Properties can be used to delay initialization of a resource until the moment it
 An instance property containing an *init_accessor_declaration* is considered settable during the construction phase of the object, except when in a local function or lambda. The ***construction phase of an object*** includes the following:
 
 - During execution of an *object_initializer* (§12.8.17.2.2)
-- During evaluation of a *with_expression*’s *member_initializer_list*  ([§xxx](plug in here link to v9 records grammar))
+- During evaluation of a *with_expression*’s *member_initializer_list*  (§records-grammar)
 - Inside an instance constructor of the containing or derived type, on `this` or `base`
 - Inside the *init_accessor_declaration* of any property, on `this` or `base`
 - Inside attribute usages with named parameters (§23.2.3)