-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 97
[Version 9.0] Feature support for target typed new
#1469
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: draft-v9
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ | ||
| # 12 Expressions | ||
|
|
||
| ## 12.1 General | ||
|
Check warning on line 3 in standard/expressions.md
|
||
|
|
||
| An expression is a sequence of operators and operands. This clause defines the syntax, order of evaluation of operands and operators, and meaning of expressions. | ||
|
|
||
|
Check warning on line 6 in standard/expressions.md
|
||
| ## 12.2 Expression classifications | ||
|
|
||
| ### 12.2.1 General | ||
|
|
||
| The result of an expression is classified as one of the following: | ||
|
|
||
| - A value. Every value has an associated type. | ||
| - A variable. Unless otherwise specified, a variable is explicitly typed and has an associated type, namely the declared type of the variable. An implicitly typed variable has no associated type. | ||
| - A null literal. An expression with this classification can be implicitly converted to a reference type or nullable value type. | ||
|
|
@@ -2526,6 +2526,11 @@ | |
| object_creation_expression | ||
| : 'new' type '(' argument_list? ')' object_or_collection_initializer? | ||
| | 'new' type object_or_collection_initializer | ||
| | target_typed_new | ||
| ; | ||
|
|
||
| target_typed_new | ||
| : 'new' '(' argument_list? ')' object_or_collection_initializer? | ||
| ; | ||
|
|
||
| object_or_collection_initializer | ||
|
|
@@ -2536,6 +2541,10 @@ | |
|
|
||
| The *type* of an *object_creation_expression* shall be a *class_type*, a *value_type*, or a *type_parameter*. The *type* cannot be a *tuple_type* or an abstract or static *class_type*. | ||
|
|
||
| If `type` can be inferred from usage, it can be omitted, as allowed by *target_typed_new*. It is a compile-time error to omit `type` if the type cannot be inferred. A *target_typed_new* expression has no type. However, there is an implicit object-creation conversion (§imp-obj-creation-conv) from a *target_typed_new* expression to every type. It is a compile-time error if a *target_typed_new* is used as an operand of a unary or binary operator, or if it is used where it is not subject to an object-creation conversion. | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. "If For example, if I have: void M(int x) { ... }
void M(Guid g) { ... }... then can I write
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. (I strongly suspect that clarifying this will be the biggest change required for this feature. I don't know whether we'll need to consider everywhere that target_typed_new can exist...)
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This one will be tough. Your example generates CS0121: The call is ambiguous between The example in the speclet shows a method with several overloads, Now, if you use this: |
||
|
|
||
| If `type` is present, let `T` be that type; otherwise, let `T` be the implied type. | ||
|
|
||
| The optional *argument_list* ([§12.6.2](expressions.md#1262-argument-lists)) is permitted only if the *type* is a *class_type* or a *struct_type*. | ||
|
|
||
| An object creation expression can omit the constructor argument list and enclosing parentheses provided it includes an object initializer or collection initializer. Omitting the constructor argument list and enclosing parentheses is equivalent to specifying an empty argument list. | ||
|
|
@@ -2544,7 +2553,7 @@ | |
|
|
||
| If any of the arguments in the optional *argument_list* has the compile-time type `dynamic` then the *object_creation_expression* is dynamically bound ([§12.3.3](expressions.md#1233-dynamic-binding)) and the following rules are applied at run-time using the run-time type of those arguments of the *argument_list* that have the compile-time type `dynamic`. However, the object creation undergoes a limited compile-time check as described in [§12.6.5](expressions.md#1265-compile-time-checking-of-dynamic-member-invocation). | ||
|
|
||
| The binding-time processing of an *object_creation_expression* of the form `new T(A)`, where `T` is a *class_type*, or a *value_type*, and `A` is an optional *argument_list*, consists of the following steps: | ||
| The binding-time processing of an *object_creation_expression* of the form `new T(A)`, where the specified or implied type `T` is a *class_type*, or a *value_type*, and `A` is an optional *argument_list*, consists of the following steps: | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. A target-typed new expression isn't "of the form
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. (Existing potential problem) Should this include If it's not intended to exclude that case, why use "of the form" at all? |
||
|
|
||
| - If `T` is a *value_type* and `A` is not present: | ||
| - The *object_creation_expression* is a default constructor invocation. The result of the *object_creation_expression* is a value of type `T`, namely the default value for `T` as defined in [§8.3.3](types.md#833-default-constructors). | ||
|
|
@@ -2559,7 +2568,7 @@ | |
|
|
||
| Even if the *object_creation_expression* is dynamically bound, the compile-time type is still `T`. | ||
|
|
||
| The run-time processing of an *object_creation_expression* of the form new `T(A)`, where `T` is *class_type* or a *struct_type* and `A` is an optional *argument_list*, consists of the following steps: | ||
| The run-time processing of an *object_creation_expression* of the form `new T(A)`, where the specified or implied type `T` is *class_type* or a *struct_type* and `A` is an optional *argument_list*, consists of the following steps: | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Another example of the same kind of thing. |
||
|
|
||
| - If `T` is a *class_type*: | ||
| - A new instance of class `T` is allocated. If there is not enough memory available to allocate the new instance, a `System.OutOfMemoryException` is thrown and no further steps are executed. | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this include pointer types?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, because a pointer type can't be used in an object creation expression. See https://github.com/dotnet/csharpstandard/blob/draft-v8/standard/expressions.md#1281721-general