feat(ht)

Author: rinman57

hypothesis_testing/hypothesis_testing.ipynb

@@ -657,7 +657,7 @@
         "\n",
         "**Step 2 — Significance level:** $\\alpha = 0.05$\n",
         "\n",
-        "**Why use 7.5 million USD here?** The sample mean is around 8.4 million USD. If we test \\(H_a: \\mu > 5{,}000{,}000\\), the **t-statistic would be very large** (about 7) and the **p-value would be tiny** (about \\(10^{-12}\\)) - strong evidence, but awkward to display. Choosing \\(\\mu_0\\) closer to \\(\\bar{x}\\) keeps **t** and **p** in a familiar numeric range so you can see the decision logic clearly. The mechanics are the same for any \\(\\mu_0\\)."
+        "**Why use 7.5 million USD here?** The sample mean is around 8.4 million USD. If we test $H_a: \\mu > 5{,}000{,}000$, the **t-statistic would be very large** (about 7) and the **p-value would be tiny** (about $10^{-12}$) - strong evidence, but awkward to display. Choosing $\\mu_0$ closer to $\\bar{x}$ keeps **t** and **p** in a familiar numeric range so you can see the decision logic clearly. The mechanics are the same for any $\\mu_0$."
       ]
     },
     {

hypothesis_testing/hypothesis_testing_instructor.ipynb

@@ -893,7 +893,7 @@
         "\n",
         "**Step 2 — Significance level:** $\\alpha = 0.05$\n",
         "\n",
-        "**Why use 7.5 million USD here?** The sample mean is around 8.4 million USD. If we test \\(H_a: \\mu > 5{,}000{,}000\\), the **t-statistic would be very large** (about 7) and the **p-value would be tiny** (about \\(10^{-12}\\)) - strong evidence, but awkward to display. Choosing \\(\\mu_0\\) closer to \\(\\bar{x}\\) keeps **t** and **p** in a familiar numeric range so you can see the decision logic clearly. The mechanics are the same for any \\(\\mu_0\\)."
+        "**Why use 7.5 million USD here?** The sample mean is around 8.4 million USD. If we test $H_a: \\mu > 5{,}000{,}000$, the **t-statistic would be very large** (about 7) and the **p-value would be tiny** (about $10^{-12}$) - strong evidence, but awkward to display. Choosing $\\mu_0$ closer to $\\bar{x}$ keeps **t** and **p** in a familiar numeric range so you can see the decision logic clearly. The mechanics are the same for any $\\mu_0$."
       ]
     },
     {
@@ -1061,7 +1061,7 @@
               "np.float64(0.9764691345103486)"
             ]
           },
-          "execution_count": 30,
+          "execution_count": null,
           "metadata": {},
           "output_type": "execute_result"
         }