Supporting v2.0

[tuloski]

Is this supporting MAVlink v2.0? Because the standard c# generators of pymavlink don't work properly.

[MartinStokelj]

Is this supporting MAVlink v2.0?

[MikaelFerland]

I did it here, but some part is missing regarding the message signing and I did not test with the log file https://github.com/MikaelFerland/mavlink.net/tree/protocol_upgrade

[dsuarezv]

Nice!

[MartinStokelj]

This code will be able to read mavlink1 and mavlink2? Can you give more info how it will decide which protocol it is?

[MikaelFerland]

@MartinStokelj I follow the protocol here https://mavlink.io/en/guide/mavlink_2.html and it's backward compatible with MAVLink v1.0
@dsuarezv could I do a pull request?

[MartinStokelj]

I beleave something is not ok with the protocol.
According to link
MAVLink 2 truncates any zero-filled bytes at the end of the payload before the message is sent and sets the packet len field appropriately (MAVLink 1 always sends all bytes).
I think this is not implemented

[MikaelFerland]

Your right I forgot this part.

[ha-ves]

will this upgrade pull request get approved?