feat(team-agents): add effort level to all sub-agents#66
Conversation
Set reasoning effort budgets aligned with each agent's role: leader/senior-engineer/deep-research → high, performance-engineer/python-expert → medium, junior-engineer → low. Bump version 1.7.0 → 1.8.0. Co-Authored-By: duyetbot <duyetbot@users.noreply.github.com>
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)Reviewer's GuideAdd an File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
Welcome! 👋Thank you for your first contribution to this project! We appreciate you taking the time to improve our codebase. Next Steps
Contribution Guidelines
Thanks again for contributing! 🎉 |
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
You’ve run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (8)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Co-Authored-By: duyetbot <duyetbot@users.noreply.github.com>
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request updates the plugin version to 1.8.0 and introduces an effort metadata field across various agent definitions to control reasoning depth. Feedback indicates that the effort parameter is currently incompatible with the opus and haiku models used by the leader and junior-engineer agents, as these models do not support the reasoning/thinking feature, rendering the new configuration ineffective for those specific agents.
| name: leader | ||
| description: Coordinate complex tasks by breaking requirements into parallel workstreams, delegating to senior-engineer agents, and ensuring quality. | ||
| model: opus | ||
| effort: high |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The effort field is used to control reasoning depth (thinking), which is a feature currently supported by Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Since this agent is explicitly configured to use model: opus (line 4), the effort: high setting will be ignored as Opus does not support the thinking parameter. To achieve the intended high-depth reasoning for the leader role, consider updating the model to sonnet. This will also likely improve response quality and reduce latency compared to Opus.
| name: junior-engineer | ||
| description: Execute well-defined tasks with blazing speed and precision. Specializes in implementation from clear specifications. Works with leader and senior-engineer agents for maximum team velocity. | ||
| model: haiku | ||
| effort: low |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The effort parameter is not supported by the haiku model. While low effort aligns with the agent's goal of 'blazing speed', the parameter will be ignored by the model. If you intend to use reasoning depth control, a compatible model like sonnet would be required, though haiku remains an appropriate choice for simple, fast execution tasks where reasoning is not the priority.
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d7f7d6e7c4
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| "name": "team-agents", | ||
| "description": "Leader and Senior Engineer agents for coordinated parallel task execution. Leader breaks down complex tasks and delegates to multiple senior engineers working in parallel.", | ||
| "version": "1.7.0", | ||
| "version": "1.8.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Bumping only the Claude manifest to 1.8.0 introduces a cross-manifest version mismatch because team-agents/.codex-plugin/plugin.json remains at 1.7.0. The repository’s validation (scripts/validate-plugins.sh, validate_cross_manifest) now fails with team-agents: version differs between Claude and Codex manifests, which can block CI/release workflows that enforce manifest parity.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Summary
effortfrontmatter field to all 6 team-agent sub-agents to control reasoning depth per rolehigh(complex decisions, thorough analysis)medium(focused specialist work)low(speed-first execution on clear specs)Test plan
Summary by Sourcery
Add configurable effort levels to all team-agent roles to control reasoning depth and update plugin metadata accordingly.
New Features:
Enhancements: