Skip to content

TypeObjectRegistry refactor [21133] - #139

Merged
EduPonz merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
feature/type-registry-refactor
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

TypeObjectRegistry refactor [21133]#139
EduPonz merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
feature/type-registry-refactor

Conversation

@richiware

@richiware richiware commented Jun 3, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

This PR only regenerate the IDL files.

Related implementation PR:

Contributor Checklist

  • Commit messages follow the project guidelines.
  • N/A Changes do not break current interoperability.
  • N/A New feature has been documented/Current behavior is correctly described in the documentation.
  • N/A Applicable backports have been included in the description.

Reviewer Checklist

  • The PR has a milestone assigned.
  • The title and description correctly express the PR's purpose.
  • Check contributor checklist is correct.
  • CI passes without warnings or errors.

@richiware richiware changed the title TypeObjectRegistry refactor TypeObjectRegistry refactor [21133] Jun 3, 2024
@richiware

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Manual CI passed ✅

@richiware

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

[Manual CI] passed ✅

@adriancampo adriancampo left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Signed-off-by: Ricardo González Moreno <ricardo@richiware.dev>
Signed-off-by: Ricardo González Moreno <ricardo@richiware.dev>
@richiware
richiware force-pushed the feature/type-registry-refactor branch from 5aa3690 to 342bc98 Compare June 13, 2024 08:12
@richiware

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Manual CI passed ✅

@EduPonz EduPonz added this to the v3.0.0 milestone Jun 14, 2024
@EduPonz
EduPonz merged commit 7c43098 into master Jun 14, 2024
@EduPonz
EduPonz deleted the feature/type-registry-refactor branch June 14, 2024 05:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants